New Science Blog -> Looking for input/advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter David_Harkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blog Science
AI Thread Summary
Starting a new blog focused on science journalism can attract interest by interviewing researchers about their work. Key areas of interest for the target audience include consciousness and neuroscience, particle and high-energy physics, and cosmology. Engaging with experts in these fields, such as those working on quantum gravity, can provide valuable content. It's essential to develop strong writing skills and seek feedback from editors or peers to ensure clarity and balance in presenting complex scientific concepts. This approach can help avoid the common pitfalls of being too technical or overly simplistic, enhancing the blog's credibility and appeal.
David_Harkin
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys, I am starting a new blog and was looking for a bit of input.

As I have friends in many "interesting" research groups around the UK, I was thinking of doing a bit of science journalism, interviewing people about their research.

I was looking for input/advice, specifically if there is anything my target audience would like to read about in particular? Or, any areas of science research they would like to learn about a bit more?

Any input is much appreciated.

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've always considered doing this; just guessing from a lot of the discussions and science shows I see bouncing around the networks, I think the three biggest markets are currently:

1) consciousness / neuroscience / cognition
2) particle and high-energy physics
3) cosmology / astronomy
 
Cheers Pythagorean. I was thinking of interviewing a guy working on quantum gravity first. However, I know somebody in HEP who I'm sure would be keen as well.
 
Work on your writing skills. Get an editor or a friend to review every post you make beforehand. check and see if they come away with an understanding of the core concepts your wrote about. Science blogs have a bad reputation for being overly technical or too watered down, it's hard to get the balance right so be sure to get your work reviewed.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top