Newbie question on atsrophotography

  • Thread starter Thread starter Holocene
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Exposure time significantly affects astrophotography by determining how many stars are visible in an image. Longer exposure times allow more light to be captured, revealing fainter stars, but exposures over a minute can result in star trails due to Earth's rotation. For digital cameras, it's essential to open the aperture fully and focus at infinity, experimenting with exposure times from several seconds to a few minutes. A clock drive may be necessary for longer exposures to avoid blurring. Ultimately, testing different settings is crucial for achieving the desired results in capturing stars.
Holocene
Messages
237
Reaction score
0
What effect does exposure time have on images?

Say I just wanted to take a picture of some stars in the night sky, just with a cammera, no other optics...

Is it the exposure time that will show the stars?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The exposure depends on the sensitivity of the film (ISO setting) and the focal length of the lens. The longer the exposure the more stars will be visible, but if it is longer than around a minute the stars will be blurred into lines as the Earth rotates.
The easiest way is to try different settings and see.

It's a little more difficult with a digital camera.
 
Open the aperture all the way, focus at infinity, and take exposures of several seconds up to a few minutes, depending upon your subject. Beyond that you'll need some kind of clock drive, unless you desire star trails in your images.

- Warren
 

Thread 'Potential biosignature found in Mars rock'

Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
View full post »

Thread 'Does it make sense to build new radio telescopes?'

TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
View full post »

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Optimizing Exposure Times: Balancing Efficiency and Image Quality
Replies
41
Views
6K
I Help with my Polar Aligning Star Tracker please
Replies
18
Views
3K
Diffraction Effects and Artifacts in Telescopes like the JWST
3
Replies
125
Views
7K
Stargazing Is it nebulosity or an artefact?
Replies
28
Views
4K
Stargazing Castor, Pollux, Mars and the Moon
Replies
0
Views
1K
I Lines of stars that we see in the sky
Replies
26
Views
5K
B How bright is the Sun compared to the sky?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Stargazing Telescope Guiding Techniques: Improving Exposure Times through Auto Guiding
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
B Star like object travels in a zigzagging pattern relative to other stars
Replies
43
Views
7K
Stargazing Q: Meridian flip
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top