Newton must respect the law of lever

  • Thread starter Thread starter dedaNoe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Lever Newton
AI Thread Summary
The discussion argues that Newton's laws, particularly his law of gravity, must align with the law of the lever, which is foundational in physics. It posits that when two bodies with different masses fall towards each other due to gravity, their accelerations and displacements must adhere to the principles of energy conservation and the law of the lever. The author suggests that the work done by the forces acting on the bodies should cancel out, leading to a contradiction in Newton's framework if not properly aligned with the law of the lever. The conclusion drawn is that any conflict between Newton's gravity and energy conservation stems from a failure to respect the law of the lever. This highlights a perceived inconsistency in classical mechanics regarding force, distance, and energy.
dedaNoe
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Newton must respect the law of lever as we all must.
The law of lever is the 1st law ever in physics and every thing
must agree with it.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\section{Newton must respect the law of lever}
\hspace{1 cm}I know most of you will object me as I'm the first
with such approach. But, I do have a point so please let me make
it. Assume that body A and body B have masses $M_a$ and $M_b$,
such that $M_a>M_b$. They are initially at distance R and without
initial push they start to fall on each other only because their
mutual gravity pull. We view only the part of the interaction from
the release until the collision. The gravity force for each body
according to Newton is given with:
\begin{equation}
F=G\frac{M_a M_b}{R^2}
\end{equation}
Newton's gravity law respects his third law, so:
\begin{equation}\label{Newton3}
F_a=-F_b
\end{equation}
Newton's second law claims that force equals to mass times
acceleration so \ref{Newton3} will turn into:
\begin{equation}
a_a M_a = -a_b M_b
\end{equation}
This means that $a_a < a_b$ because $M_a > M_b$ so within same
time body A will pass smaller distance from body B i.e.
\begin{equation}\label{condit}
\Delta X_a<\Delta X_b
\end{equation}
The work done by some force while making displacement is given
with:
\begin{equation}\label{Work_done}
W=\int_{X1}^{X2} Fdx
\end{equation}
In our system we have only two forces making displacement - only
two works done and they must cancel because of conservation of
energy for such a closed system given with:
\begin{equation}\label{Cosevr_energy}
\sum W_i=0
\end{equation}
From \ref{Cosevr_energy} we have $W_a=-W_b$. Widen up it should
give:
\begin{center}
$\int_{X_{1a}}^{X_{2a}}F_a dx=-\int_{X_{1b}}^{X_{2b}}F_b dx$

$\int_{X_{1a}}^{X_{2a}}Fdx=\int_{X_{1b}}^{X_{2b}}Fdx$

$F(X_{2a}-X_{1a})=F(X_{2b}-X_{1b})$

\end{center}
So it must be:
\begin{equation}\label{must}
F\Delta X_a=F\Delta X_b
\end{equation}
But it is not so because of \ref{condit}. By the way the equation
\ref{must} is very similar to the law of lever only though the
forces must have inverse the ratio of their distances or:
\begin{equation}\label{Lever}
F_a D_a = D_b F_b
\end{equation}
Therefore, the conflict between Newton's gravity and conservation
of energy is due to Newton's disobedience for the law of lever.
\end{document}

tex doesn't work that well. Just copy pase into your TeX editor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the work done on the bodies have opposite sign, why do they both gain kinetic energy? Last time I checked, work was positive when force and displacement are pointing in the same direction.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top