Newtonian - Force, Gravity, and Bungee Jumping

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force exerted by a bungee cord when a 55kg person jumps off a bridge, experiencing a downward acceleration of 7.8m/s². The net force is determined using the equation ΣF = ma, resulting in a calculated force of -418N when considering the downward acceleration. The force of gravity acting on the jumper is 539N, leading to the conclusion that the bungee cord must exert a force of +121N to reduce the descent to the specified acceleration. The reasoning for subtracting the forces is to determine the additional force required by the bungee cord to counteract gravity and achieve the desired acceleration. This analysis highlights the relationship between gravitational force and the force exerted by the bungee cord during the jump.
staycrunchy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A person weighing 55kg jumps off of a bridge with a bungee cord attached. The problem seeks to find the bungee cords Force vector when the acceleration is 7.8m/s2 in the downward direction.

m = 55kg
a1 = g = 9.8m/s2

To find:
F1 when a2 = 7.8m/s2 downward.

I've specified my grid as \uparrow+ \rightarrow+ so the accelerations are technically negative.

Homework Equations


\SigmaF = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


\SigmaF = ma
\SigmaF=55kg(-7.8m/s2)
\SigmaF = -418N

\SigmaF = F1 - F2
\SigmaF = 539N - 418N
Force of bungee cord acting = +121N
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you subtract the forces?
 
semc said:
Why did you subtract the forces?

The 539N was the Force with F=ma and a = g. I think I forgot to write that.
The -428N was the Force with F=ma and a = 7.8m/s2.

My inclination was to subtract the forces to get the force required by the bungee cord to slow the decent to the 7.8m/s2
 
Well since gravitational force is downwards and he is traveling downwards...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top