Newton's 2nd Law: Calculating Side Wind Effects on a Projectile

  • Thread starter Thread starter mark-ashleigh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
To account for side wind effects on a projectile using Newton's Second Law, one must understand that the crosswind exerts a force perpendicular to the projectile's motion. This force can be expressed as F = ma, where F is the crosswind force and m is the mass of the projectile, allowing for the calculation of acceleration due to the wind. A differential equation can be derived from this relationship to model the projectile's drift in a 3-D simulation. However, real-world factors like projectile shape, spin, and variable wind conditions complicate accurate modeling. To enhance simulation accuracy, one can either find existing crosswind models or create a custom function to test within the simulation framework.
mark-ashleigh
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I just have one quick question ..
How can i use Newton's 2nd law to account for side wind (cross wind) against a projectile?
I want to find this equation or the diff equation to solve it as i want to be able to find the effects the cross wind will have on the drift of the projectile.
I know that i will have to model my simulation in 3-D on exclel (x,y,z) , but i am in great need of this equation to be able to solve z.
thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Basically, a crosswind will exert a force on the projectile (in the direction of the crosswind of course). You are right that the deviation may be in a direction perpendicular to the plane of motion of the projectile (if the motion without the crosswind were perfect and not disturbed by dissipative or deflecting forces that is).

In real life though, no projectile can be thin enough nor can the motion be really planar as modeled (inaccurately) by our equations. Besides, precission of the projectile may also occur and the projectile may even spin like Earth as would a bottle at an angle with the horizontal (as though the bottle were toppling in air). As far as simulating the actual thing is concerned, you might not be able to do it very accurately as crosswind is not consistent and may change with time.

Finally, Newton's Second Law simply states that the force and the accleration produced by it are related as

<br /> F= ma<br />

So if you can get an expression for the crosswind force, you can divide it by the mass of the projectile to get the acceleration. This would give you a differential equation which you can (a) either solve to get a or (b) incorporate the acceleration function in your computations to get the equation for trajectory...

Now you can either

(a) look for a crosswind model on the internet
(b) think of some function yourself that could do your job (as you are doing a simulation and practically any physically possible function should work)...and change it as you test the simulation

Cheers
Vivek
 
Last edited:
:smile:
Thank you for the help. Was much needed :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top