Newton's law conceptual question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion addresses two conceptual questions related to Newton's laws. First, it asserts that the force exerted by a person on the Earth is equal and opposite to the force the Earth exerts on the person, making the initial statement false. Second, it explores whether the water level in a glass increases when an ice cube melts, concluding that it does not, as the mass remains constant and the volume of water displaced equals the volume of the ice. Participants confirm each other's understanding and emphasize the application of Newton's third law in both scenarios. This exchange highlights the importance of understanding fundamental physics concepts.
riverjib
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement [/b]
The force you exert on the Earth is insignificant compared to the force the Earth exerts on you. (True or false)

The attempt at a solution[/b]

I believe that this is false based upon Newton's third law--shouldn't the forces be equal and opposite?


2. Ice cube floating in glass of water--water level increases when it melts.

Is this also false? Unless the ice cube is being held under the water, shouldn't the density and volume differences cancel out since the mass does not change? (Assuming the ice is chemically identical to the water?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe that this is false based upon Newton's third law--shouldn't the forces be equal and opposite?

I believe You're right.

about the second question , I don't want to say something wrong, so You'll have to wait some 1 else .
but I think you're right here as well
 
You are right at 2, too. At yes, that is the right way of thinking.
 
Thank you both!
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi riverjib! Welcome to PF! :smile:
riverjib said:
The force you exert on the Earth is insignificant compared to the force the Earth exerts on you. (True or false)

I believe that this is false based upon Newton's third law--shouldn't the forces be equal and opposite?

Yup! :biggrin:
Ice cube floating in glass of water--water level increases when it melts.

Is this also false? Unless the ice cube is being held under the water, shouldn't the density and volume differences cancel out since the mass does not change? (Assuming the ice is chemically identical to the water?)

Yup again!

(but mention the law specifically: water displaced equals … ?)

That's why sea-level doesn't rise when floating ice in Antarctica melts. :wink:
 
Thanks Tim :smile:
I'm glad I found this forum!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top