Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the acceleration of a satellite in orbit using two formulas derived from Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation. The first formula, a=GMm/r^2, was incorrectly applied, leading to a significant discrepancy in results compared to the second formula, a=4pi^2r/T^2. Participants suggest using the correct form a=Gm1/r^2, where m1 is the mass of the planet, to obtain accurate results. The calculated acceleration for Venus using the corrected formula yielded a value of 2.784*10^-8, which aligns more closely with expected outcomes. This highlights the importance of using the appropriate equations in gravitational calculations.
rvnt
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am doing a lab-"Kepler's Laws and Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation". There is an image representing various positions, at equal intervals, of a satelitte in an elliptical orbit around the earth. A list of planets and their radi and periods are given. I have calculated acceleration using two formulas a=GMm/r^2 and a=4pi^2r/T^2
Question states: "Calculate acceleration using the two equations and compare the results. Do your results confirm Newton's law of universal gravitation?"

Homework Equations




F=Gm1m2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Ex. of results: accleration obtained for Venus using 1st equation= 5.5407*10^24 and using 2nd equation=0.0113286
I was expecting them to be the same...please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rvnt said:

Homework Statement


I am doing a lab-"Kepler's Laws and Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation". There is an image representing various positions, at equal intervals, of a satelitte in an elliptical orbit around the earth. A list of planets and their radi and periods are given. I have calculated acceleration using two formulas a=GMm/r^2 and a=4pi^2r/T^2
Question states: "Calculate acceleration using the two equations and compare the results. Do your results confirm Newton's law of universal gravitation?"

Homework Equations

F=Gm1m2/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Ex. of results: accleration obtained for Venus using 1st equation= 5.5407*10^24 and using 2nd equation=0.0113286
I was expecting them to be the same...please help

a=GMm/r^2 is wrong

go back to the general equation

F=Gm1m2/r^2
m1=mass of Venus
m2=mass of satellite

F=m2a=Gm1m2/r^2

a=Gm1/r^2

compare to the one you originally had (a=GMm/r^2)
 
But mass of the satellite isn't given..?
 
Wait...so as you said to use a=Gm1/r^2...for venus I got a=(6.67*10^-11)(4.8690*10^24)/(1.08*10^11)^2= 2.784*10^-8
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top