Newton's second law and a weight and string

AI Thread Summary
When a heavy weight is suspended from a string and a second string is attached below it, the outcomes of pulling the lower string depend on the nature of the force applied. Pulling steadily increases the tension on the upper string, which can exceed its strength, causing it to break. In contrast, pulling the lower string with a jerk creates a sudden downward acceleration that results in an upward inertia force on the block, leading to the lower string breaking instead. The key difference lies in how the forces and accelerations interact with the weights and tensions in each scenario. Understanding these principles involves applying Newton's laws of motion and concepts of inertia and impulse.
rejz55
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



suspended a heavy weight from a light string and attach a similar string below it. if you pull on the lower string with a steadily increasing force, the upper string will break; if you pull the lower string with a jerk, the lower string will break. please explain to me both cases why it happens? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rejz55 said:

Homework Statement



suspended a heavy weight from a light string and attach a similar string below it. if you pull on the lower string with a steadily increasing force, the upper string will break; if you pull the lower string with a jerk, the lower string will break. please explain to me both cases why it happens? thanks!
This one's a bit tricky to answer, but if this is a homework question, you must show some of your attempt or thoughts on this before we can assist. You might want to think about how Newton's laws might apply for each case.
 
I'm not quite sure about the case of pulling the lower string with a jerk, but I think the force exceeding lower string's strength is less than the weight of the heavy block. Because of the inertia of the block the force applied to the block by the lower string is still not enough to move it, so the lower string will break. The upper string almost doesn't feel the force applied to the lower one. Am I right? And if yes, why do I feel it is possible to explain it more ellegant? :)
 
Couple of days ago I hit the tree with my bike and became wiser ;)
If you pull the lower string with a jerk, you give the block relatively large acceleration directed downwards, so large inertia force due to the mass of the block is directed upwards. So the upper string feels just the weight of the block (like before pulling it), whereas the lower string feels the force of pulling which is greater than its strength. Hence the lower string will break.
If you pull on the lower string with a steadily increasing force, you give the block relatively small acceleration, so small inertia force due to the mass of the block is directed upwards. Now the upper string feels the weight of the block enlarged by the force you pull it down, which in total is greater than its strength, whereas the lower string feels the tension of the upper one decreased by the weight of the block (i.e. if the weight of the block is nearly as the strength of the upper string, than you can break the upper string using just a tiny (steadily increasing) force directed downwards). Hence the upper string will break.
 
read about inertia in your textbook... and impulse, maybe...
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top