Newton's Second Law: (Major Flaw in Lab)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights a significant flaw in a lab procedure related to Newton's Second Law, specifically regarding the omission of friction in calculations. Participants question how this oversight affects the interpretation of the Force-Acceleration graph, particularly the slope's representation. The lab setup involved measuring distances with ticker tape, but there are concerns about the adequacy of the data collected, as only two measurements were taken. Additionally, the necessity of varying hanging masses to accurately plot a Force vs. Acceleration graph is emphasized. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of comprehensive data collection and consideration of all forces at play in experimental physics.
anth0ny
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is actually a major flaw in the procedure of this lab. (Hint: look at your answer to question 3). Can you find it? What could be done to correct this flaw? Are there any drawbacks to your proposed change in the procedure?

2. Question 3

What does the slope of the best fitting line on the Force-Acceleration graph represent.

The Attempt at a Solution



I would like to state the fact that friction during the lab was not taken account of however I do not understand how that ties into question number three... Is it because the graph is based on a theoretical value which is missing friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, Anth0ny.
There isn't enough information to figure out your question.
What did you do in the lab? What measurements did you make, what graph did you draw, what did it look like?
 
Hey,

Thank you :) In the lab we set up a cart with a brick on top and then tied a piece of string to one end and let it fall by placing a certain weight on the other end. Ticker tape was used to record six points a second.

2yvj7z5.jpg


The first half from the right is my first distance, then there is a gap which I measured the time for and then finally the second half closest to the left is the second distance. Both distances are equal to 0.1 seconds while the gap is a certain amount of time in this case (3/6) x 0.1 seconds. I converted the cm into m. Finally I used that data to calculate both the force and acceleration:

10x5zrp.png


Finally I graphed it using excel:

6759wo.png


Thank you for helping me out by the way!

,
Anthony
 
Okay, I have seen this experiment many times. I trust you had a pulley on the string to reduce friction.

It sounds like you made only two measurements - the distance traveled in 0.1 seconds in two places on the tape. Curious, you say the tape records 6 points per second, so they are 1/6 second or about 0.16 seconds apart - so how could you measure for 0.1 second?
What could you graph with only two measurements? Just 2 dots on your graph? Also no mention of how you calculated the acceleration or the force.

The first post mentions a force vs acceleration graph.
Did you repeat the experiment with different hanging masses so you have accelerations for various applied forces? That is the only way you could make such a graph.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top