Newton's Second Law Particle Problem

AI Thread Summary
A particle of mass m is subjected to a force described by F(x) = -k*x^-2, leading to a problem of determining the time it takes to reach the origin when released from rest at x = d. The initial approach involves equating Newton's second law with the force equation, resulting in a velocity expression after integration. However, the user struggles to derive the position as a function of time, expressing uncertainty about the next steps. Another participant suggests using kinematic equations while clarifying that they account for the position-dependent nature of acceleration. The discussion emphasizes the need for careful integration to solve for time, despite concerns about the applicability of kinematic equations in this context.
skyrolla
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



4. A particle of mass m is experiences a Force that attracts the particle following
F(x) = -k*x^-2
(an inverse square relationship) where x is the distance from an origin at x = 0 and k is a
positive constant. If the particle is released from rest at x = d, how long does it take to reach the origin?



Homework Equations



F = ma = m(dv/dt)


The Attempt at a Solution



Equating Newton's second and the Force equations yields -k*x^-2 = m(dv/dx)(v).

After seperating the variables and integrating once, I got V = sqrt(2k/m)*sqrt((1/x)-(1/d)).

My boundary condition was that at x = d, v =0 for the integration. Setting V = dx/dt and trying to solve for x(t) is unfathomable, so I'm not sure how to continue here, or if I have been taking the wrong approach. I've double checked my math as well, so I don't believe the error is there, but I could always be wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let the velocity of the particle be v when it passes the origin.
The kinematic equation becomes
v = vo + at. But a = -k/m*1/x^2 and vo = 0
So
dx/dt = -k/m*1/x^2 or
x^2*dx = -k/m*t*dt
Find integration between the limits x = d to x = 0 and find t.
 
Hi skyrolla! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and an integral: ∫ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

If you need to solve ∫ √x/(√x - a) dx, just make the obvious substitution. :wink:
 
I thought that kinematic equation was only applicable to a constant force, not a position-dependent varying one?
 
skyrolla said:
I thought that kinematic equation was only applicable to a constant force, not a position-dependent varying one?
In the kinematic equation we have taken into account the position dependence of the acceleration. And we have taken the integration to find t. So it must work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top