Newton's Third Law and Relativity

psholtz
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Suppose I have a proton at the origin, and a (stationary) electron on the x-axis at x=r.

Taking q to be the elementary charge, the force acting on each of these particles is:

F = \frac{q^2}{r^2}

Now suppose that the electron is heading towards the proton (in the negative x-direction) at a relativistic speed. Suppose gamma=2. The field generated by the electron will be "squished" in the x-direction, and correspondingly the force experienced by the proton will be weaker than it would have been had the electron been stationary.

The electric field generated by a moving charge (as seen in the "stationary" frame) is given by:

E = \frac{Q}{r^2}\frac{1-\beta^2}{1-\beta^2\sin^2\theta}

where Q is the charge on the moving particle and theta is the angle between the origin of the moving particles coordinate frame and the direction of the particle's motion (in this case, the x-axis).

In our case, we have:

E = \frac{1}{4}\frac{q}{r^2}

and so the force the proton experiences, due to the moving electron, is given by:

F = \frac{1}{4}\frac{q^2}{r^2}

Meanwhile, the force on the (moving) electron, due to the stationary proton, is given by the Lorentz force law:

F = qE + \frac{1}{c}v \times B

Since the proton doesn't generate a magnetic field, the force on the (moving) electron due to the stationary proton, at the moment the electron is passing the point x=r, is:

F = \frac{q^2}{r^2}

In other words, the force the proton imparts to the electron is 4x the force that the electron imparts to the proton.

What happened to Newton's Third Law?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's Third Law is equivalent to conservation of momentum. In electrodynamics, the total momentum of a particles in the system is generally not conserved. However, electric and magnetic fields also carry momentum. The total momentum of the particles and the fields is conserved.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy

Similar threads

Back
Top