NIB Magnet Dropped in a Cu tube - Forces

AI Thread Summary
A strong magnet drops slowly through a conducting copper tube due to the generation of Eddy currents, which create opposing magnetic fields. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the direction of these induced currents and their resultant forces. The right-hand rule is mentioned as a tool for determining the direction of the magnetic fields, but there are concerns about its application in this scenario. The relationship between the induced currents and the forces acting on the magnet is explored, questioning whether the formula I X B = F is applicable. Understanding these interactions is crucial for explaining the magnet's slow descent through the tube.
MrLiou168
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to figure out and explanation as to why a strong magnet drops so slowly through a non-magnetic but conducting Cu tube. The attached diagram shows the original B field, induced Eddy currents, and secondary B field as a result of those Eddy currents, but I can't figure out my Force vectors. Any help greatly appreciated.


Homework Equations


F = qvB
F = qv X B
F = IL X B

The Attempt at a Solution


See attached diagram...
 

Attachments

  • photo (1).JPG
    photo (1).JPG
    21.4 KB · Views: 462
Physics news on Phys.org
I think after studying the following,

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html

that your drawing has the induced currents going the wrong way? The induced magnetic field looks right though (note something is wrong as the right-hand rule does not apply to your drawing (induced current and secondary magnetic field)). The induced magnetic field below the falling magnet repels the falling magnet and the induced magnetic field above the falling magnet attracts the falling magnet.
 
Thanks for the response. Those examples are all of coils, and not solid conductors. Does this make a difference?

And in terms of the directions of the Eddy currents, is it correct to use I X B = F?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top