No, I do not have a chart of trends in my text.

AI Thread Summary
NaF is suggested to have the shortest ionic bonds and highest lattice energy among KF, NaF, and RbCl, while RbCl is believed to have the lowest melting point. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between bond length, lattice energy, and melting points, noting that stronger bonds typically correlate with shorter lengths and higher energy. Participants encourage reviewing chemistry texts for clarity on these trends and concepts. There is a focus on understanding the factors influencing bond lengths and melting points, including electronegativity and intermolecular forces. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of grasping these fundamental chemistry principles for accurate interpretation.
lorka150
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Out of KF, NaF, and RbCl, does NaF have the shortest ionic bonds as well as highest lattice energy, and RbCl have the lowest melting point?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't look like you've done much work on this... Read your chemistry book it will tell you all of these trends in the corresponding sections. You need to show at least some effort even if its not the correct answer.
 
I did, sorry. I just didn't type it all. I read through the trends, and just want to make sure I interpreted them correctly. I was under the impression tha the shorter bonds and highest lattice energy would be the same, because the increased lattice = stronger bonds, and the strong bonds are a high energy, and the shorter they are, the stronger they are.

Sorry that it was taken that way. GOsh, I feel stupid!
 
lorka150 said:
Out of KF, NaF, and RbCl, does NaF have the shortest ionic bonds as well as highest lattice energy, and RbCl have the lowest melting point?

Thanks
What do you think, and why? Show your attempt to solve this problem.
 
Hi Geoff
I explained my reasoning in the message above you. I thought that the highest lattice and shortest bonds correspond, and I know that as you move up and to the right that they are at the strongest - therefore because F is the farthest and Na is higher than K, I chose NaF.

For the lowest melting point, I was under the impression it would be the opposite (descendig and towards the left).
 
lorka150 said:
Hi Geoff
I explained my reasoning in the message above you. I thought that the highest lattice and shortest bonds correspond, and I know that as you move up and to the right that they are at the strongest - therefore because F is the farthest and Na is higher than K, I chose NaF.

For the lowest melting point, I was under the impression it would be the opposite (descendig and towards the left).
Bond length is determined by a number of factors, which, as Steve said, should be detailed in your text. Consider bond lengths of each ion and electronegativities. This page might aid your understanding.

Melting point is directly proportional to intermolecular forces. The more energy it takes to break the bonds between molecules, the higher the melting point.
 
Thanks for the link. I do not understand it, but thank you for your help.
 
lorka150 said:
Thanks for the link. I do not understand it, but thank you for your help.
Well, we'll do what we can until you do understand. First of all, do you have a chart of trends in your text?
 
Back
Top