No Permanent Dipole Moment in Two-Level System w/External Field

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
In two-level system, with external field applied, why there is no permant dipole moment? In classical point of view, dipole moment is coming from displacement of positive and negative charge. In quantum case, inside the atom, even no external field, there is certain probability for the electron be anywhere around the nucleus. Hence, the displacement should induced a dispole moment, but text says there is no such dipole moment, why?

By the way, if we consider the density matrix, what does the off-diagonal element refer to? How the off-diagonal element correspons to the induced dipole moment (with external field applied)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A "permanent dipole moment" means that the dipole moment was there before the field was applied. For this case the energy shift is proportional to the field strength. A dipole moment caused by the field is called an "induced dipole moment", and the energy is proportional to the square of the field strength. A permanent electric dipole moment is forbidden by parity conservation.
 
clem said:
A "permanent dipole moment" means that the dipole moment was there before the field was applied. For this case the energy shift is proportional to the field strength. A dipole moment caused by the field is called an "induced dipole moment", and the energy is proportional to the square of the field strength. A permanent electric dipole moment is forbidden by parity conservation.

In the text, the dipole moment due to applied field is written as d_{11}, d_{12}, d_{21}, d_{22} and the diagonal terms vanish, why is that?
 
The perturbation is J.E which is a pseudoscalar so <i|j.E|i> vanishes by parity conservation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top