No Permanent Dipole Moment in Two-Level System w/External Field

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4
In two-level system, with external field applied, why there is no permant dipole moment? In classical point of view, dipole moment is coming from displacement of positive and negative charge. In quantum case, inside the atom, even no external field, there is certain probability for the electron be anywhere around the nucleus. Hence, the displacement should induced a dispole moment, but text says there is no such dipole moment, why?

By the way, if we consider the density matrix, what does the off-diagonal element refer to? How the off-diagonal element correspons to the induced dipole moment (with external field applied)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A "permanent dipole moment" means that the dipole moment was there before the field was applied. For this case the energy shift is proportional to the field strength. A dipole moment caused by the field is called an "induced dipole moment", and the energy is proportional to the square of the field strength. A permanent electric dipole moment is forbidden by parity conservation.
 
clem said:
A "permanent dipole moment" means that the dipole moment was there before the field was applied. For this case the energy shift is proportional to the field strength. A dipole moment caused by the field is called an "induced dipole moment", and the energy is proportional to the square of the field strength. A permanent electric dipole moment is forbidden by parity conservation.

In the text, the dipole moment due to applied field is written as d_{11}, d_{12}, d_{21}, d_{22} and the diagonal terms vanish, why is that?
 
The perturbation is J.E which is a pseudoscalar so <i|j.E|i> vanishes by parity conservation.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top