No problem, glad I could help!

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathewsMD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Curves
MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Find the values of c such that the area of the region bounded by the parabolas y = x2 - c2 and y = c2 - x2 is 576.

Attempt:

576 = -cc∫-x2 + c2 - (x2 - c2) dx

576 = 2-cc∫c2 - x2 dx

576 = c2x -(1/3)(x3) l0c *I know by symmetry that the area of 0 → c is half the area of -c → c

576 = c3 - (1/3)c3

576 = (2/3)(c3)

c ~ 9.52

This is the incorrect answer for c. I know there are other methods to solve this problem, but I am trying to answer this question using this strategy. Can anyone please point out the error in my work?
Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MathewsMD said:
Find the values of c such that the area of the region bounded by the parabolas y = x2 - c2 and y = c2 - x2 is 576.

Attempt:

576 = -cc∫-x2 + c2 - (x2 - c2) dx

576 = 2-cc∫c2 - x2 dx

576 = c2x -(1/3)(x3) l0c *I know by symmetry that the area of 0 → c is half the area of -c → c

576 = c3 - (1/3)c3
You did the integration incorrectly. First you lost your original factor of 2. Then, you lost another factor of 2 when you forgot to substitute the lower integration limit.

576 = (2/3)(c3)

c ~ 9.52

This is the incorrect answer for c. I know there are other methods to solve this problem, but I am trying to answer this question using this strategy. Can anyone please point out the error in my work?
Thank you!
You did the integration incorrectly. First you lost your original factor of 2. Then, you lost another factor of 2 when you forgot to substitute the lower integration limit. Just redo the integration with more care, and you'll get the right answer.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Chestermiller said:
You did the integration incorrectly. First you lost your original factor of 2. Then, you lost another factor of 2 when you forgot to substitute the lower integration limit. Just redo the integration with more care, and you'll get the right answer.

Haha okay, I actually canceled the factors out (I must have thought it was in the denominator for some reason). Thank you for finding it!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top