I Noether theorems, the Lagrangian and energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the definition of energy in relation to the Lagrangian and Noether's theorem. Concerns are raised about the Lagrangian's applicability, as it traditionally focuses on translational kinetic energy and potential energy. However, it is clarified that Lagrangians can be formulated for various energy forms, including electromagnetic and gravitational energy. The conversation also touches on the possibility of representing chemical energy conversions, such as those in photosynthesis, through Lagrangians, indicating that while feasible in principle, it is not commonly practiced. Overall, the Lagrangian framework is versatile and can encompass a wide range of energy types beyond the basic forms.
Dadface
Messages
2,489
Reaction score
105
I have read in different places that an up to date definition of energy refers to the Lagrangian and Noether. But isn't the Lagrangian too limited because it refers to an ideal situation involving translational KE and to PE only? I would have thought that a good definition of energy would be relevant to all forms of energy...electrical, chemical, radiant, heat etc.

I think I may be missing something. If so can somebody tell me what it is please?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dadface said:
But isn't the Lagrangian too limited because it refers to an ideal situation involving translational KE and to PE only?
The Lagrangian is not limited in this way. You can write Lagrangians for EM, gravity, and a large number of other theories.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Dadface
Thank you Dale. But does it apply to every form of energy, for example is it possible to write a Lagrangian which represents the energy conversion reactions occurring during photosynthesis?
 
It is possible in principle. Chemical energy is just EM energy. I don't think that is ever done in practice, but I am not a chemist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dadface
Thanks Dale.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top