Non-abelian Gauge invariance (chapter 15.1 in Peskin/Schroeder)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the covariant derivative as presented in chapter 15.1 of Peskin/Schroeder, particularly examining the expansion of the scalar quantity U(y,x) and the introduction of the vector field Aμ. Participants explore the mathematical steps involved and the definitions used in the derivation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on how the vector field Aμ emerges from the expansion of U(y,x) in the context of the covariant derivative.
  • Another participant suggests that the appearance of Aμ is simply by definition, as it is the coefficient of the linear term in the expansion of U.
  • A different participant discusses their own expansion and questions how the term U'(x,x) relates to Aμ, pondering whether the pure phase condition is applicable in this context.
  • One participant provides a Taylor expansion of U and defines Aμ as (i/e) ∂μ U(x,x), noting the implications for unitarity and hermiticity of A.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the derivation steps and the definitions involved, indicating that there is no consensus on the interpretation of certain terms and conditions in the derivation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential ambiguities in the definitions and conditions used, such as the interpretation of the four-vector n and the implications of the zero separation condition.

Stalafin
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I am trying to understand the derivation of the covariant derivative in Peskin/Schroeder (chapter 15.1, page 483).

This is the important stuff:
n^\mu\partial_\mu\psi=\lim_{\epsilon \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{\epsilon}\left[\psi(x+\epsilon n)-\psi(x)\right]

Scalar quantity: U(y,x):
U(y,x) \rightarrow e^{i\alpha(y)} U(y,x) e^{-i\alpha(x)}

Conditions for zero separation and pure phase:
U(y,y)=1
U(y,x)=exp[i\phi(y,x)]

Covariant derivative:
n^\mu D_\mu \psi = \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{\epsilon}\left[\psi(x+\epsilon n)-U(x+\epsilon n,x)\psi(x)\right]

Expansion of U(y,x) in the separation of the two points:
U(x+\epsilon n,x) = 1 - i e\epsilon n^\mu A_\mu(x) + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)

A_\mu(x) is a new vector field and is the coefficient of the displacement \epsilon n^\mu. Why?! I don't see how the author gets there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't this just by definition. You expand U in powers of ε nμ, and the coefficient in the linear term, you define that to be Aμ.
 
I thought about making an expansion... This is what I came up with (Peskin expands for epsilon):
\left. U(x+\epsilon n,x) \right|_{\epsilon=0} = U(x,x) + U'(x,x) n \epsilon + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)

So, U(x,x) becomes one from the zero separation condition; what I have trouble understanding is the next part. How does that work out?

U'(x,x) n \epsilon = - ie\epsilon n^\mu A_\mu(x)

Do I use the pure phase condition for that? And how am I supposed to read the n? As a four-vector itself? Or is that:
n=n^\mu A_\mu(x)

Where does the rest come from?
 
The Taylor expansion is
U(x+\epsilon n,x)=U(x,x)+\epsilon n^\mu\partial_\mu U(x,x) + O(\epsilon^2)
Then we define
A_\mu(x)\equiv (i/e) \partial_\mu U(x,x)
Note that, with the factor of i, unitarity of U implies that A is hermitian. And to be precise, the partial derivative actually acts only on the first x.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K