Non-calc problem taken out from Spivak's Calculus, I reach a dead end

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hivoyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a problem from Spivak's Calculus that requires proving two statements involving inequalities related to y and y_0. The first part was successfully demonstrated using the reverse triangle inequality, confirming that y is greater than 0. However, the second part, which involves proving that |\frac{1}{y} - \frac{1}{y_0}| < \epsilon, remains unresolved, with participants suggesting further exploration of the transformed inequality |\frac{y_0 - y}{yy_0}|. The conversation highlights the importance of distinguishing cases based on the sign of y_0. Overall, the thread seeks assistance in completing the proof for the second part of the problem.
Hivoyer
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem states that:

y_0 \neq 0
|y - y_0| &lt; \frac{|y_0|}{2}
|y - y_0| &lt; \frac{\epsilon|y_0|^2}{2}

And I am supposed to use these to prove that:

y \neq 0
|\frac{1}{y} - \frac{1}{y_0}| &lt; \epsilon

Homework Equations



|a| - |b| \leq |a - b|
(Reverse Triangle Inequality - my professor hinted me to use it)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok proving the first part was easy, I simply used the reverse triangle inequality like this:

1.I change |y - y_0| to |y_0 - y|
2.I use the inequality: |y_0 - y| \geq |y_0| - |y| &lt; \frac{|y_0|}{2} =&gt; -|y| &lt; \frac{|y_0|}{2} - |y_0| =&gt; -|y| &lt; -\frac{|y_0|}{2} =&gt; |y| &gt; \frac{|y_0|}{2} and since we know y_0 is greater than 0, it's square and it's fractions are also greater than 0, so this means y is greater than 0.

Now for part 2 I played around with |\frac{1}{y} - \frac{1}{y_0}| and even after transforming it by completing the fraction addition: |\frac{y_0 - y}{yy_0}| I couldn't figure out how to proceed.Could someone help for this second part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hivoyer said:

Homework Statement



The problem states that:

y_0 \neq 0
|y - y_0| &lt; \frac{|y_0|}{2}
|y - y_0| &lt; \frac{\epsilon|y_0|^2}{2}

And I am supposed to use these to prove that:

y \neq 0
|\frac{1}{y} - \frac{1}{y_0}| &lt; \epsilon

Homework Equations



|a| - |b| \leq |a - b|
(Reverse Triangle Inequality - my professor hinted me to use it)

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok proving the first part was easy, I simply used the reverse triangle inequality like this:

1.I change |y - y_0| to |y_0 - y|
2.I use the inequality: |y_0 - y| \geq |y_0| - |y| &lt; \frac{|y_0|}{2} =&gt; -|y| &lt; \frac{|y_0|}{2} - |y_0| =&gt; -|y| &lt; -\frac{|y_0|}{2} =&gt; |y| &gt; \frac{|y_0|}{2} and since we know y_0 is greater than 0, it's square and it's fractions are also greater than 0, so this means y is greater than 0.

Now for part 2 I played around with |\frac{1}{y} - \frac{1}{y_0}| and even after transforming it by completing the fraction addition: |\frac{y_0 - y}{yy_0}| I couldn't figure out how to proceed.Could someone help for this second part?

For ##v > 0## the inequality ##|u| < v## is the same as ##-v < u < v##. Now just consider the two cases ##y_0 \geq 0## and ##y_0 < 0##.
 
Ray Vickson said:
For ##v > 0## the inequality ##|u| < v## is the same as ##-v < u < v##. Now just consider the two cases ##y_0 \geq 0## and ##y_0 < 0##.

I thought y_o could not be equal to 0.You mean y_0 &gt; 0 instead of y_0 \geq 0 right?
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top