Non conservative force of a wave on a surfer

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by the non-conservative force of a wave on a surfer as she accelerates from 1.93 m/s to 12.3 m/s while descending 2.95 m. The initial calculation of work done by the wave resulted in 7424.66 J, but this was deemed incorrect due to the misunderstanding of the energy contributions. The change in kinetic energy is 5334.5 J, while the change in gravitational potential energy is 2092 J, leading to a discrepancy of 3242.5 J. This difference is interpreted as the work done by the wave, highlighting the need to accurately account for energy transformations in the system. The conclusion emphasizes that the wave provides additional energy beyond the surfer's kinetic and potential energy changes.
thatgirlyouknow
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A surfer is catching a wave. Suppose she starts at the top of the wave with a speed of 1.93 m/s and moves down the wave until her speed reaches 12.3 m/s. The drop in her vertical height is 2.95 m. If her mass is 72.3 kg, how much work is done by the (non-conservative) force of the wave?

Homework Equations



Wnc = Ef-E0
Wnc = .5mvf^2 + mghf - (.5mv0^2 + mgh0)

The Attempt at a Solution



Wnc = .5*72.3*12.3^2 + 72.3*-9.8*0 - (.5*72.3*1.93^2 + 72.3*-9.8*2.95)
.5*72.3*12.3^2 - (.5*72.3*1.93^2 + 72.3*-9.8*2.95)
5469.1335 - (134.66 + (-2090.19))
= 7424.66 J

This should become negative because the non conservative force is opposing displacement (since the surfer is moving down the wave). However, this answer is not correct. What should be changed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Increasing velocity from 1.93 m/s to 12.3 m/s represents a change in kinetic energy of 5334.5 J

And the change in height of 2.95 m represents a change in grav. potential energy of only 2092 J.

So from where does the extra energy/work come?
 
The wave, I suppose... so do I take the total of those two and subtract the number I found?
 
Well the difference in change in kinetic energy and change in potential energy is 3242.5J and presumably that is work done by the wave.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top