Non-Conservative Forces - Help, Please

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksdeponte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a soapbox car descending a hill with friction. The key points include the need to account for the work done by friction, which opposes the car's motion, and the relationship between the distance traveled along the ramp and the vertical height using trigonometry. The correct approach involves using the equation for non-conservative work, where initial potential energy minus work done by friction equals final kinetic energy. The participant ultimately calculates the required height to achieve a final speed of 12.5 m/s, arriving at a height of approximately 9.14 meters. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying trigonometric relationships in the context of the problem.
ksdeponte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! I am having a lot of trouble with the following problem and would be very grateful for any help that you could offer me!

Homework Statement



There is a constant 125 N frictional force that opposes the motion of a soapbox car as it goes down a hill. The mass of the car is 100.0 kg and the angle of the hill is 55degrees, measured from the negative x axis. Its initial speed is 0.0 m/s and the final speed has to be 12.5 m/s in order for the car to make the jump successfully. The goal of the problem is to find the vertical height above the ground needed to have a final velocity of 12.5 m/s.
The problem also gives a hint to solve the problem, determine a way to express the distance the car travels in terms of its vertical height.

F = 125
m = 100.0 kg
theta = 55degrees, measured from the negative x-axis (?), 180degrees for frictional force
vi = 0.0 m/s
vf = 12.5 m/s
delta x = ? m
h = ? m

Homework Equations



I've worked on this thing for hours and have no idea what to do.
I know that I will have to use the formula for non-conservative work, and that the final PE and initial KE are not needed. Also, Wnc will have to be in the form of (F cos theta)delta x, and that theta will be 180 since the work done by friction is opposing the car's displacement.

(F cos theta)delta x = KEfinal - PEinitial
= (1/2mvf^2) - (mgh)

But how would you determine delta x in terms of the vertical height, h? I've tried a multitude of things, but never get the right answer.

The Attempt at a Solution






Thanks in advance for your help!

Katrina DePonte
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Katrina, welcome to PF!

Because of the frictional (non-conservative force), energy is not conserved, and instead of:

initial potential energy = final kinetic energy

we instead have:

initial potential energy - work done by friction = final kinetic energy

or,

initial potential energy = final kinetic energy + work done by friction,

The kinetic energy is known, and the other two things depend upon h. Your job is to find the value of h that satisfies the equation.

It looks like this is sort of what your equation is trying to be. However you have to be careful. The friction force points along the ramp, which is not the same thing as the x direction. The distance traveled along the ramp is related to the starting height by basic trigonometry. Hint: the distance along the ramp the hypotenuse of a right angle triangle, and the height is the vertical side of that triangle. Which trigonometric ratio is the ratio these two sides of a right triangle?
 
This is simple trigonometry. draw a triangle with delta x and h as sides.
 
So, the work done by friction would not be (F cos 180)delta x, but (F sin 55)delta x?
which would then make delta x = h/sin 55.

PEi = KEf + (F sin 55)delta x
mgh = 1/2mvf^2 + (F sin 55)(h/sin 55)
100.0(9.8)h = 1/2(100.0)(12.5^2) + 125h
980h = 7812.5 + 125h
855h = 7812.5
h = 9.14 m

.. Is this the correct approach then?
 
You have delta x in the direction of the slope, right?
delta x = h/sin 55 is correct, but the work done by friction is still (F cos 180)delta x.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top