Non inertial frame of reference(rotating)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the effects of centrifugal acceleration on gravitational acceleration in a rotating frame of reference, specifically on Earth. The equation for effective gravitational acceleration, g, incorporates both gravitational acceleration, g0, and centrifugal acceleration, highlighting that they do not always point in the same direction. Participants express confusion about deriving the equation ωR^2/g0=0.0035 and its dependence on latitude, with some noting the relationship between centripetal and centrifugal forces. The conversation also touches on explaining Earth's equatorial bulge through both non-inertial and inertial frames of reference. Overall, the complexities of gravitational effects due to Earth's rotation and their implications are central to the discussion.
TimeRip496
Messages
249
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


$$g_o=\frac{GM}{R^2}e_R$$
where g0 is the gravitational acceleration, G = 6.67 * 10-11Nm2 /kg2 is the universal gravitational constant, M= 5.98 *1024 kg is the mass of the Earth, and R = 6.38 * 106 m its radius

$$g = g_0-ω*[ω*(r+R)]$$....(8.29)
where gravitational acceleration g that is felt near the surface of the Earth (i.e., on the surface of the Earth we cannot discerned between gravity g0 and the centrifugal acceleration -ω*[ω*(r+R)], we can only feel the resulting acceleration g )

The Earth’s angular velocity vector is given by ω= 7.3 * 10-5ez rad/s (i.e., it is directed along the z'-axis ), and we assume that it is a constant.

It is to be noted that because of the presence of the centrifugal acceleration
-ω*[ω*(r+R)] in this equation for the effective gravity, g and g0 will in general
not point exactly in the same direction. This effect is rather small, but measurable as
ωR^2/g_0= 0.0035 . It should also be clear from the equation (8.29) that the magnitude of the effect is a function of latitude.
upload_2016-7-31_15-45-16.png

Source:http://www.astro.uwo.ca/~houde/courses/PDF files/physics350/Noninertial_frames.pdf

where R is the radius of Earth, r is the position of the object measure from the rotating frame of reference which is moving at a constant velocity and constant angular velocity, r' is the position of the object measure from the center of the Earth

2. Homework Equations

ωR^2/g0= 0.0035 where R is the radius of Earth.
I have no idea how they get this equation. Besides I don't quite get what they mean about "that the magnitude of the effect is a function of latitude.".

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea how to get to this equation ωR^2/g0= 0.0035. I try to calculate the above equation but I get is 303234462.4 instead of 0.0035.
$$ωR^2/g_0=ωR^2*\frac{R^2}{GM}=(7.32*10^{-5})(6.38*10^6)^2*\frac{(6.38*10^6)^2}{6.67*10^{-11}*5.98*10^{24}}=303234462.4$$
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-7-31_15-43-29.png
    upload_2016-7-31_15-43-29.png
    3 KB · Views: 483
  • upload_2016-7-31_15-44-45.png
    upload_2016-7-31_15-44-45.png
    6.2 KB · Views: 550
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't quite get what they mean about "that the magnitude of the effect is a function of latitude.".
They are working out a subjective feeling of the gravitational acceleration "g" in terms of the different effects that come into play.
One of these effects is centrifugal ... why would the centrifugal force vary with latitude and how?

As for the equation ...
Recall the work you have done on circular morion in an inertial frame: what is the equation for centripetal acceleration?
What is the relationship between centripetal acceleration and centrifugal force?
Now divide the centrifugal "acceleration" by the bare gravity to get the correct expression: compare with what the author did above.
 
Simon Bridge said:
They are working out a subjective feeling of the gravitational acceleration "g" in terms of the different effects that come into play.
One of these effects is centrifugal ... why would the centrifugal force vary with latitude and how?

As for the equation ...
Recall the work you have done on circular morion in an inertial frame: what is the equation for centripetal acceleration?
What is the relationship between centripetal acceleration and centrifugal force?
Now divide the centrifugal "acceleration" by the bare gravity to get the correct expression: compare with what the author did above.
Ok thanks. I know the equatorial bulge at Earth can be explained by non-inertial frame of reference using centrifugal force. But can i explain it from the inertial frame of reference using centripetal force? Cause as we move from the equator to the poles, the centripetal force require to hold the mass that make up Earth decreases, therefore the gravitational force(remaining one not being use to provide the centripetal force) will increase from the equator to the pole, causing the bulge?
 
TimeRip496 said:
I have no idea how to get to this equation ωR^2/g0= 0.0035.
This expression has a typographical error. The author of the notes misplaced the square.
 
  • Like
Likes Simon Bridge
... which was, of c
TimeRip496 said:
Ok thanks. I know the equatorial bulge at Earth can be explained by non-inertial frame of reference using centrifugal force. But can i explain it from the inertial frame of reference using centripetal force? Cause as we move from the equator to the poles, the centripetal force require to hold the mass that make up Earth decreases, therefore the gravitational force(remaining one not being use to provide the centripetal force) will increase from the equator to the pole, causing the bulge?
In the inertial frame, gravity is the same across the surface of the Earth. You need to think about why objects inside a car going around a corner tend to slide to one side.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top