Non-Viral Nanoparticle Gene therapy

  • Thread starter Thread starter bioquest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gene Therapy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential use of non-viral nanoparticle gene therapy in humans, particularly for applications like treating lung cancer. Participants express curiosity about the feasibility of using nanoparticles for gene therapy across various body locations and the effectiveness of such treatments. There is a focus on the limitations of current viral gene therapies and the need for alternatives. Questions arise regarding the ability to identify correct DNA bases in cells, given that all cells theoretically contain identical DNA, and whether it is possible to remove genes in adult organisms. The conversation touches on the complexities of DNA modification, including methylation, which can affect gene expression without altering the DNA sequence itself. Participants seek clarity on gene removal techniques in embryos versus adults, highlighting the ongoing exploration of gene therapy methods.
bioquest
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if this is usable in humans right now http://www.telomolecular.com/nanocircles.asp or why it couldn't be

I was also wondering...viral gene therapy has a lot of downsides so they're looking at non-viral nanoparticle gene therapy...they've been able to use nanoparticles via IV to people to treat lung cancer...theoretically could you use non-viral nanoparticle gene therapy to do any gene therapy? and to get to any place in the body? What percentage of cells could it get to what places could/couldn't it get to? Is there anyone here who actually works with nanoparticle gene therapy, ie in lab animals or with human gene therapy?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
I don't see an edit post button for some reason..
I mean I know the nanoparticles would have to have an oxidative coating...I talked to my friend whose studied molecular biology at university for a long time and she really couldn't provide any info on it...so that's why I wanted to talk to someone who was in the field of studying nanoparticles/gene therapy/using them
 
Um ignore the other two posts, I was just wondering, every cell in your body contains identical DNA right? So even though there are base mismatches that can occur (let's say for some reason a high amount occurs in an organism) isn't it possible to know the correct base of every cell without being able to view the insides of the cells since all genes in every cell are the same?

Also my friend said no to this next question but I wasn't sure if that was the answer so I wanted to get a second opinion: Is it possible to remove genes in an adult organism- if not why? (ie with a virus or something) What are the ways this can be done in an embryo? I don't think it's possible to remove genes in an adult organism but I still wanted those answers better known in my head so if someone can provide answers to those..thanks. (This is in regards to viral or non viral gene stuff)
 
bioquest said:
every cell in your body contains identical DNA right?
Not exactly, try reading up on Methylation for one type of modification.

bioquest said:
Also my friend said no
Listen to your friend.
 
What are the methods they can use to remove genes in embryos (Other than through breeding) So just to verify..there is no way to do gene removal in adults?

Also just to verify...so not all cells would have the same correct bases ie in brain cells? (ie if it wasn't for mismatched bases)
(Aside from things that could be altered to not exist like DNA methylation, although I don't know maybe that can't be removed, I just read though that
DNA methylation is a type of chemical modification of DNA that can be inherited and subsequently removed without changing the original DNA sequence.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Deadly cattle screwworm parasite found in US patient. What to know. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2025/08/25/new-world-screwworm-human-case/85813010007/ Exclusive: U.S. confirms nation's first travel-associated human screwworm case connected to Central American outbreak https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/us-confirms-nations-first-travel-associated-human-screwworm-case-connected-2025-08-25/...

Similar threads

Back
Top