Nonconservative vs conservative force

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 19K views
-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the difference between two of the forces above?? Can someone please give me an example so that it's easier for me to understand

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
A conservative force is a force that conserves mechanical energy, where the work done by that force on an object moving between 2 points is independent of the path taken. That's a pretty unclear definition, so suffice to say that in basic mechanics, gravity forces and spring forces are conservative forces, and every other type force (friction, tension, applied forces, other contact forces, etc.) are non conservative forces.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Volcano
Your explanation is basically the same as what my book says.. If I am not mistaken my instructor used to say that we can convert back the energy produced/lost by conservative forces but not in non-conservative forces. Is this right?
 
We say that gravity is a conservative field, because there IS independence of path.
the potential energy of an object is mgh, mass X gravitational constant X height above ground. It does NOT matter how the object got there the result is the same.
As the object moves through this field(gravity in this example) sometimes the force works
AGAINST the object, and sometimes the force helps the object (downhill) but if we move in a closed path, the net result is zero. We did NOT profit, and we did not loose anything,
we BROKE EVEN (in layman's terms)