Nonconservative vs conservative force

AI Thread Summary
A conservative force conserves mechanical energy, meaning the work done is independent of the path taken between two points. Examples of conservative forces include gravity and spring forces, while non-conservative forces include friction and tension. In conservative fields, such as gravity, potential energy can be calculated using the formula mgh, and the energy remains constant regardless of the object's path. Non-conservative forces, on the other hand, do not allow for energy recovery, leading to energy loss in the system. Overall, the key distinction lies in the ability of conservative forces to maintain energy balance in closed paths.
-EquinoX-
Messages
561
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



What is the difference between two of the forces above?? Can someone please give me an example so that it's easier for me to understand

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
A conservative force is a force that conserves mechanical energy, where the work done by that force on an object moving between 2 points is independent of the path taken. That's a pretty unclear definition, so suffice to say that in basic mechanics, gravity forces and spring forces are conservative forces, and every other type force (friction, tension, applied forces, other contact forces, etc.) are non conservative forces.
 
  • Like
Likes Volcano
Your explanation is basically the same as what my book says.. If I am not mistaken my instructor used to say that we can convert back the energy produced/lost by conservative forces but not in non-conservative forces. Is this right?
 
We say that gravity is a conservative field, because there IS independence of path.
the potential energy of an object is mgh, mass X gravitational constant X height above ground. It does NOT matter how the object got there the result is the same.
As the object moves through this field(gravity in this example) sometimes the force works
AGAINST the object, and sometimes the force helps the object (downhill) but if we move in a closed path, the net result is zero. We did NOT profit, and we did not loose anything,
we BROKE EVEN (in layman's terms)
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top