Nonconservative work and a slide

  • Thread starter Thread starter pttest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slide Work
AI Thread Summary
A 21kg child on a slide experiences nonconservative work of -376J while descending from a height of 2.4m. The initial attempt to calculate the child's speed at the bottom resulted in an incorrect equation and calculations for potential energy. The correct approach involves using the equation that accounts for the change in potential energy minus nonconservative work equaling the change in kinetic energy. It is suggested to first calculate the speed assuming no friction to establish a baseline for comparison. This method will help clarify the expected speed when friction is considered.
pttest
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At a playground, a 21kg child plays on a slide that drops through a height of 2.4m . The child starts at rest at the top of the slide. On the way down, the slide does a nonconservative work of -376J on the child. What is the child's speed at the bottom of the slide?

Homework Equations



Change in Kinetic energy + change in potential energy = nonconservative work


The Attempt at a Solution


[0.5(21)(v^2 - 0)] + [(21) (9.8) (0 - 2.4^2)] = -376
Therefore v = 8.77m/s
But the answer is wrong. Could someone help ??/

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation is wrong. It should be:

change in potential energy - nonconservative work = change in kinetic energy.

Can you see why? If there were no friction, ALL of the gravitational potential energy would be converted into kinetic energy. Since there is some friction, not all of the potential energy is converted. Some of it is wasted.
 
You also have your calculations for 'change' wrong -

Should not be an ^2 in the PE term.

One more suggestion: Try doing the calculation once assuming there is no friction at all - then ALL the PE would be changed into KE. Now think: should the speed you calculate with friction be more or less than this value? This should help bracket your answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top