A What is the significance of the nonholonomity condition in General Relativity?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter samson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Gr
samson
Hi everyone! Please what are the conditions necessary for space and time to be nonholonomic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To give a specific example. In polar coordinates, ##r, \theta##, a vector field that consists of unit radial vectors (often written as ##\hat{r}##), and orthogonal tangential vectors (often written as ##\hat{\theta}##) would be a non-holonomic basis. It might be more familiar in terms of the dual vectors (though the terminology might not be familiar, perhaps). dr and d##\theta## can be interpreted as dual vectors. Then dr and d##\theta## would be holonomic, and not normal (because the vectors don't have unit lengths). However, dr and ##r \, d\theta## would be non-holonmic, but normal, since the (dual) vectors do have unit length.

The notion of vectors as partial derivative operators and dual vectors gets some mention in Sean Caroll's lecture notes <<link>>, see for instance

In spacetime the simplest example of a dual vector is the gradient of a scalar function, the set of partial derivatives with respect to the spacetime coordinates, which we denote by “d”:

It's also worth looking up what a coordinate basis is. Note that "coordinate basis" is more or less just another term for "holonomic basis". (Perhaps some more mathematical sort will correct me if there is some tiny difference). If you look up "coordinate basis" in Caroll's lecture notes, you'll find that it's identified as being equiavalent to partial derivatives with respect to the coordaintes. So in our example a coordinate basis of vectors could be identified with partial derivative operators, such as ##\partial_r## or in different notation ##\frac{\partial}{\partial r}##. The identification of vectors as partial derivative operators is not very intuitive, but an important defintion for differential geometry.
 
  • Like
Likes samson, vanhees71 and dextercioby
A holonomic basis is a basis where all of the basis vectors commute. Given a holonomic basis, it is possible to choose coordinates ##x^\mu## such that the basis vectors are the set of partial derivative operators ##\partial/\partial x^\mu##.
 
  • Like
Likes samson
samson said:
Hi everyone! Please what are the conditions necessary for space and time to be nonholonomic?
This is very helpful to me! Thanks for your time sir!
 
Ben Niehoff said:
A holonomic basis is a basis where all of the basis vectors commute. Given a holonomic basis, it is possible to choose coordinates ##x^\mu## such that the basis vectors are the set of partial derivative operators ##\partial/\partial x^\mu##.

Thanks sir
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top