Noninertial/fictitious forces (Movement on a rotating Earth)

jasker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two trains are traveling east and west on the equator at 50km/h. What is the difference in weight of an apple (mass = 200g) in each train? In which train is it lighter?


Homework Equations



x denotes vector (cross) product, bold denotes a vector quantity. Subscripts rot and in denote the rotating and inertial frames of reference respectively. Ω is the angular velocity of rotating earth. r is the position vector to a point on the equator (magnitude here equal to Re, the radius of earth)

The apparent force due to motion on a rotating Earth is:
Frot = marot
= main - m[2Ω x vrot + Ω x (Ω x r)]
= F + Ffict

The fictitious force Ffict consists of two terms, the Coriolis force and the Centrifugal force:
Coriolis force F = -2mΩ x vrot = -2mΩvrot
Centrifugal force F = -mΩ x (Ω x r) = -mΩ^2 * Re


The Attempt at a Solution



On the train traveling east, the Coriolis force points toward the axis of rotation of the earth, increasing the weight of the apple:
Frot = mg + 2mΩvrot - (mΩ^2 * Re)

On the train traveling west, the Coriolis force points outward from the axis of rotation of the earth, decreasing the weight of the apple:
Frot = mg - 2mΩvrot - (mΩ^2 * Re)

At this point, I am stuck. Is what I have correct so far? How do I calculate the weight of the apple given the two equations above? Do I just plug in these values?
m = 0.2kg
Ω = 2π rad / 86400 sec = 7.27*10^-5 rad/s
Re = 6378.14 km @ equator
vrot = 50 km / h = 13.89 m/s

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two comments
1) The problem wants the difference in weights.
2) How is "weight" normally measured?
 
Well I would assume that it would be using the gravitational definition of weight, weight being the force exerted on a body by gravity, so weight would be equal to F = mg, and would be expressed in Newtons (kg * m/s2)

So the weight of the apple at rest would be F = main = mg = 0.2kg * 9.8m/s = 1.96N

On the train traveling east, the weight would be:
Frot = mg + 2mΩvrot - (mΩ^2 * Re) = 1.96N + 2(0.4kg)(7.27*10-5 rad/s)(13.89 m/s) - (0.2kg)(7.27*10-5 rad/s)2(6378140m) = 1.95406578 N

On the train traveling west, the weight would be:
Frot = mg - 2mΩvrot - (mΩ^2 * Re) = 1.96N - 2(0.4kg)(7.27*10-5 rad/s)(13.89 m/s) - (0.2kg)(7.27*10-5 rad/s)2(6378140m) = 1.95245009 N

Thus it would be lighter on the train traveling west. Does that all look right?
 
Typically scales measure the normal force, by seeing how much a spring compresses. So really you should have Frot-N=0, but Frot=N, so you're good.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top