Nonrelativistic perihelion drift, best references ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lalbatros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drift References
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the search for high-quality references on the classical calculation of perihelion drift, particularly for Mercury, with an emphasis on precision compatible with General Relativity corrections. The user expresses frustration at the difficulty in finding clear and synthetic presentations of the analytical derivation starting from the equations of motion. They seek resources that detail perturbation theory and provide end results derived from Newton's equations. The user notes that existing references often model perturbing planetary orbits inadequately. Overall, the need for accessible, detailed academic resources on this topic is highlighted.
lalbatros
Messages
1,247
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I have found several overviews on the classical perihelion drift calculation from the planets perturbations.
However, I could not identify what the best reference would be.

I am -of course- interrested by those calculations that garantee a precision compatible with the discussion of the GR corrections.
I would also prefer the clearest and most synthetic presentation.
Finally, it would be nice if this paper would be available on the net. :rolleyes:

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I am still interrested in a reference on the classical calculation of the perihelion drift of mercury.
I took quite some time to Google for that and could not find what I am looking for.
Very surprising.

I would just like to see the detailled analytical derivation for the perihelion drift.
Starting from the equations of motion, detailling a perturbation theory and providing the end result.

I found several references modeling the perturbing planets orbits by massive circles or ellips.
But the model is never derived from the Newton's equation.
Should I see how to do that, I would be happy enough.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top