Do wavefunctions always need to be normalised?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dindimin09
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavefunctions
Dindimin09
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I understand the meaning of normalising wavefunctions, but what instance would a wavefunction NOT need to be normalised?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is the overall probability that must be normalized. Although it it very convenient to normalize the wave functions, you need not do so, as long as you normalize the final probabilities.
 

Thread 'Schrödinger equation and classical wave equation'

Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
View full post »

Thread 'Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
View full post »

Thread 'Is Maxwell's electromagnetism an effective (field) theory?'

Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Normalisation Constant In Wavefunction
Replies
8
Views
1K
Normalisation of free particle wavefunction
Replies
6
Views
3K
Normalising the wavefunction - two answers
Replies
12
Views
934
I I cannot normalise this: F= Cexp(-r/a)
Replies
10
Views
969
B A stupidly basic question about expectation value
Replies
8
Views
2K
Normalisation and normalising wavefunctions
Replies
3
Views
2K
A Many-Particle Wavefunction Question
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Assumptions made in stationary-state scattering
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Wavefunction in polar coordinates and its bra ket notation
Replies
14
Views
2K
Why do we need a normalisation constant for wavefunctions?
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top