Normalization of Hydrogen wavefunction

rini
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the (1 0 0) and (2 0 0) wave functions of hydrogen atom are properly normalized.

Homework Equations



I know that (n l ml):

(100) = (2/a^(3/2)) exp^ (-r/a)

(200) = (1/((2a)^(3/2))*(2-r/a) exp^(-r/2a)


The Attempt at a Solution



I started with H=-ke^2/r+p^2/2m and don't know how to convert the p operator into spherical coordinates
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rini said:

Homework Statement



Show that the (1 0 0) and (2 0 0) wave functions of hydrogen atom are properly normalized.

Homework Equations



I know that (n l ml):

(100) = (2/a^(3/2)) exp^ (-r/a)

(200) = (1/((2a)^(3/2))*(2-r/a) exp^(-r/2a)


The Attempt at a Solution



I started with H=-ke^2/r+p^2/2m and don't know how to convert the p operator into spherical coordinates

(100) = (2/a^(3/2)) exp^ (-r/a) is the wave function. What does it mean for it to be normalized?
 
rini said:
I started with H=-ke^2/r+p^2/2m and don't know how to convert the p operator into spherical coordinates

You don't need the p operator, or indeed any operator, in order to normalize the wave function. Look up the definition of what it means for a wave function to be "normalized."
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top