Normalization of the Angular Momentum Ladder Operator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on obtaining the matrix representation of the ladder operators \( J_{\pm} \) in quantum mechanics. The key equation derived is \( |N_{\pm}|^2 = j(j+1) - \hbar^2 m(m \pm 1) \), which is established through the relationship \( J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = N_{\pm} | jm \pm 1 \rangle \). A crucial step involves recognizing that the matrix element \( \langle jm | J_{\mp} | jm \pm 1 \rangle \) can be expressed using the Hermitian conjugate, leading to a clearer understanding of the normalization of states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, specifically angular momentum theory.
  • Understanding of ladder operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with matrix representations of operators.
  • Knowledge of Hermitian conjugates and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the normalization of quantum states and its implications.
  • Explore the properties of Hermitian operators and their matrix elements.
  • Investigate the application of ladder operators in different quantum systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on angular momentum, ladder operators, and matrix representations of quantum states.

PatsyTy
Messages
30
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Obtain the matrix representation of the ladder operators ##J_{\pm}##.

Homework Equations



Remark that ##J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The textbook states ##|N_{\pm}|^2=\langle jm | J_{\pm}^\dagger J_{\pm} | jm \rangle##, from here it is straightforward:

##\langle jm | J_{\mp} J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = \langle jm | (J^2 - J_z^2 \pm J_z | jm \rangle = \langle jm | \big( j(j+1)|jm\rangle-m^2\hbar^2 |jm\rangle \pm m \hbar^2 | jm \rangle\big)##

Giving us ##|N_\pm |^2=j(j+1)-\hbar^2 m (m\pm 1)##

What I do not understand is the very first step where we write out ##|N_{\pm}|^2=\langle jm | J_{\pm}^\dagger J_{\pm} | jm \rangle## from the given equation ##J_{\pm} | jm \rangle = N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle##.

I have tried multiplying the first equation by the hermitian conjugate of ##J_\pm|jm\rangle## giving

##\langle jm | J_\mp J_\pm | jm \rangle = \langle jm | J_\mp N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle = N_{\pm} \langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ## however I don't think this is correct as I don't see how I can get a second ##N_\pm## from ##\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ##.

The text gives the explanation "Since both ##|jm\rangle## and ##|jm+1\rangle## are normalized to unity..." and that's the justification for this step. I don't fully trust this qualitative description so I am trying to write it out mathematically. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PatsyTy said:
I have tried multiplying the first equation by the hermitian conjugate of ##J_\pm|jm\rangle## giving

##\langle jm | J_\mp J_\pm | jm \rangle = \langle jm | J_\mp N_{\pm}| jm \pm 1 \rangle = N_{\pm} \langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ## however I don't think this is correct as I don't see how I can get a second ##N_\pm## from ##\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle ##.

Here's the part that you are missing: For any matrix element of the form \langle A |O|B \rangle, we have:

\langle A |O|B \rangle = \langle B |O^\dagger|A \rangle^*

So in particular,
\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle = \langle jm\pm 1 | J_\pm | jm \rangle^*

See if that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PatsyTy
stevendaryl said:
Here's the part that you are missing: For any matrix element of the form \langle A |O|B \rangle, we have:

\langle A |O|B \rangle = \langle B |O^\dagger|A \rangle^*

So in particular,
\langle jm | J_\mp | jm \pm 1 \rangle = \langle jm\pm 1 | J_\pm | jm \rangle^*

See if that helps.

Thanks! I got it right away with that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K