Normalizing a wave function and calculating probability of position

Emspak
Messages
240
Reaction score
1
Forgive me if this goes in elementary physics, but I think since it's an upper level undergrad class

Homework Statement



A state of a particle bounded by infinite potential walls at x=0 and x=L is described by a wave function \psi = 1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2 where \phi_i are the stationary states.
a) Normalize the wave function.
b) What is the probability to find the particle between x=L/4 and x=3L/4?

Homework Equations



OK so was looking at how to approach this. One thought was to start with Schrödinger's equation

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} + V(x)\psi(x,t)

The Attempt at a Solution



We have a situation where V(x) = 0 0 < x < L and V(x) = infinity outside of that. SO the V(x) term for inside the well disappears (it's zero).

And Energy, E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m} where k is a constant, in this case 1.

That leaves us with a partial differential equation

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2}

which, moving it around a little,

i \hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} - \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2 \psi}{\partial x^2} = 0

and that's a 2nd order differential equation. The solutions are

\psi(x,t) = [A \sin(kx) + B \cos(kx)] e^{-i\omega t}

k is a wavenumber and for this to work -- for it to be zero when x is greater than L or less than 0, and some value anywhere else, the cosine term has to go, and since the wavenumber is limited to nπ/L (that's the only way you get an integral number of waves) So I should end up with

\psi(x,t) = [A \sin(k_nx)] e^{-i\omega_n t}But I am not entirely sure why the cos term has to go; I feel like I am missing a step. Either way, the probability of the particle being at any point from 0 to L is 1. So I need to integrate the wave function squared over that interval:

\int^L_0 |[A \sin(k_nx)] e^{-i\omega_n t}|^2 dx

but that's the thing, I feel like I have lost the plot with this.

ANother way to approach it was to assume that the wave function given can be

\psi = 1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2
\psi = (1\phi_1 + 2\phi_2)(1\phi_1^* + 2\phi_2^*)

and then multiply this out
\psi = (1\phi_1^* \phi_1 + 2\phi_1 \phi_2^* + 2\phi_1^* \phi_2 + 4\phi_2^*\phi_2)

SInce the phi functions are eigenvalues, the ones on the diagonal of the matrix are the only ones not zero. So we get
\psi = (1\phi_1^* \phi_1 + 4\phi_2^*\phi_2) = (1 + 4)

because the complex conjugate of a function multiplied by a function is 1.

Tht makes the whole thing add up to five. and since the probability of finding the particle on the interval 0 to x is

\int^L_0 |\psi|^2 dx = 1 \rightarrow \int^L_0 |5|^2 dx = 1 \rightarrow 25x = 1

so x = 1/25 for the whole interval, so normalizing the wave function I should get

\psi = \frac{1}{25}\phi_1 + \frac{2}{25}\phi_2

and for the probability that the particle is at L/4 and 3/4 L

(25/4)^2 and (75/4)^2

Now, if someone could tell me where I am getting lot and doing this completely wrong :-)

thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In the original question you state that the wave function is "=11+22, where are the stationary states" are those boxes a mistake?
 
try it now...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top