Chemistry Normalizing molecular speed probabiliy distribution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the normalization of the molecular speed probability distribution, represented by the equation P(C)dC = 4pi[m/2pikt]3/2exp[-mC2/2kT]C2dC. The original poster is struggling to apply normalization methods typically used for wave functions, specifically the <psi|psi>=1 approach. They are seeking guidance on how to proceed with the normalization process. A link to a relevant resource is provided for additional context. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in applying normalization techniques to this specific probability distribution.
babbagee
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the molecular speed probability distribution is normalized

Homework Equations


Molecular speed probability distribution
P(C)dC = 4pi[m/2pikt]3/2exp[-mC2/2kT]C2dC

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried many steps but i keep getting stuck. I tried using the same metods that i used to use to normalize wave funcations and that was <psi|psi>=1 but i am not getting anywhere, can some one please point me in right deirection.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Calculating the Molecular Orbitals of a Molecular State
Replies
1
Views
2K
'Residence' time distribution function for a Pulse input
Replies
14
Views
4K
Molecular speed distribution - most probable speed V
Replies
13
Views
1K
Boltzmann distribution and the number of molecules with a certain velocity
Replies
10
Views
3K
Calculating temperature from molecular speed distribution
Replies
10
Views
5K
Maxwell distributions and average, RMS, and most probable speeds
Replies
3
Views
2K
Understand Effusion of a Gas: Speed & Angle Distribution
Replies
6
Views
2K
I Finance: does the volatility of a stock follow a certain distribution?
Replies
24
Views
4K
Most probable energy and speed for Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
Replies
4
Views
4K
I Proving a multivariate normal distribution by the moment generating function
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top