Notation question for Maxwell's Equations.

neutrino33
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I know I may be in the wrong place, but I think I'll get a quicker and better response here. My question is:

How do
\nabla \cdot \textbf{B} = 0
and
\nabla \times \textbf{E} + \frac{\partial \textbf{B}}{\partial t} = 0
derive from
\Box^2 A^\mu -\partial^\mu(\partial_\nu A^\nu) = j^\mu?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations you are thinking of are implicit in the fact that you are using a 4-potential.

Because

B = \nabla x A

then

\nabla \cdot B = \nabla \cdot \nabla x A

Because the divergence of a curl is 0 (or there is no boundary of a boundary, or the exterior derivative is nilpotent, or whatever your favorite math expression is)

Using

E = -\nabla A^0 -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} A

You can take the curl to get the standard

\nabla x E = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} B
 
del.B=0,is nonexistence of magnetic monopole, and the second equation is ampere's law where the time varying magnetic field depends on circulation of electric field.This all equation can be found by using wave equation.
 
ParticleGrl said:
The equations you are thinking of are implicit in the fact that you are using a 4-potential.

Because

B = \nabla x A

then

\nabla \cdot B = \nabla \cdot \nabla x A

Because the divergence of a curl is 0 (or there is no boundary of a boundary, or the exterior derivative is nilpotent, or whatever your favorite math expression is)

Using

E = -\nabla A^0 -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} A

You can take the curl to get the standard

\nabla x E = -\frac{\partial}{\partial t} B

I buy that. I don't see, however, what happens to the j^\mu.
 
It would be useful to know that the LaTex code for vector/cross product would be: \times [ itex] \times [/itex].
 
This is what I'm working on. It is from Halzen Martin.
 

Attachments

  • HM.jpg
    HM.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 520
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top