Now sit together and play nicely!

  1. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,519
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It has been suggested, and apparently without opposition so far, that members of Congress are no longer seated separately, by party. The idea being that by simply mixing up the seating arrangement, a psychological wall will come down.

    A simple gesture, perhaps, but it has all the overtones of an idea with insidious, simple elegance. I am all for it!

    http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/jan-june11/shieldsbrooks_01-14.html
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Pengwuino

    Pengwuino 7,119
    Gold Member

    Like
     
  4. lisab

    Staff: Mentor

    Me too. Have to start somewhere, a tangible gesture could be a good start.
     
  5. Good aisles make good neighbors.
    Taiwan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zW3cudDZ4n0
    Nigeria: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLWCgq4LPA8
    Ukraine: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cD0XZlxKuig
    South Korea: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Pqhnf6XKC8
    Russia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZGaaqH2o6I
     
  6. Here are a few more:
    Sri Lanka: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FdldgpzHBtg
    India: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYewI_l-aAI
    Bolivia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjMeQoIq36c
     
  7. :rofl: I have to give the Administration credit on this one - really! With all of the new Republicans "in the House" - there will be a lot less people standing up to show support - for him.

    If he wants to see the whole room stand up - then say something that makes sense.

    PURE NONSENSE and THEATRICS - IMO.:yuck:
     
  8. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,519
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    So you are suggesting that rather than taking credit for a highly bipartisan gesture, Obama conspired to allow a Freshman Senator have all the glory? Nevermind that the Dems still own the Senate, which is where it started. I guess the Republicans giving their thumbs up rather than deferring comment are in on it as well?

    And Jimmy predicts a bar fight if we change the seating? Are you saying that all of those fights wouldn't have happened if the seating was different? If so, do you have any evidence for this or is it just wild speculation with no basis in fact?
     
  9. Ivan Seeking

    Ivan Seeking 12,519
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The Tea Party has made it clear that they don't want compromise or diplomacy. They don't want to see a functional Congress that works together. Could this be the basis for the objections?
     
  10. Math Is Hard

    Math Is Hard 4,915
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I love the idea. And if some Kung Fu fights should break out, so much the better!
     
  11. Hurkyl

    Hurkyl 16,090
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    when a member of PF starts telling me about the other the party, I almost want to stop listening, because I know what is going to follow is going to be false, because they just don't know the people in the other party very well.
     
  12. shbingo!
     
  13. Hurkyl - you are always fair (IMO).

    Do you think changing seat assignments will actually change anything other than the depth perception of unity?
     
  14. Not directed at me, but, nope. I think it's still worth doing, if only because I'd dearly love to see a congressional brawl.
     
  15. russ_watters

    Staff: Mentor

    Yeah, I don't watch C-Span, but this could change that!
     
  16. They should arm each member with nerf swords, lances, shields, and maces! Their aides could be their squires... meleeeeeeee!
     
  17. No I don't. I think that this is an attempt to fix something that isn't broken. I presented a few examples of what it looks like when it's broken. As for a Congress that works together, I don't want to see it. From here it looks like a one-party system.
     
  18. That's as dead on as a post can get. Just don't expect them to ever realize (or admit) it.
     
  19. Are you making an ironic point by saying, "them", or do you truly not get it?
     
  20. OK, I'll bite: What is it you think I don't get?
     
  21. Who is "them". In a general way, you're still unwilling to let go of the desire to divide into oppositional groups; you just re-define them.

    edit: I actually recognize that I've earned "I'll bite". I laughed at that, because frankly, I need to work on it.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook
Similar discussions for: Now sit together and play nicely!
Loading...