Nuclear Alternative for RTG Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arctic Fox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the challenges of obtaining usable fuel for a radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) experiment within the US. An alternative idea is proposed to use heat from a solar collector instead of radioactive fuel, suggesting that it could achieve comparable temperatures. The participant expresses confidence in competing with the high temperatures typically produced by RTGs. Additionally, there is a request for input on identifying affordable metals suitable for making thermocouples, ideally sourced from hardware stores. The conversation emphasizes practical approaches to thermoelectric generation using accessible materials.
Arctic Fox
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
So, I’ve been thinking that the possibility of obtaining any usable amount of fuel for an RTG experiment is impossible while I’m still within the US borders...

Fine!

I just got another idea this afternoon. Instead of using the heat from the radioactive fuel, how about using the heat from a solar collector?

http://www.livescience.com/technology/041115_solar_dish.html

I’m pretty sure I could compete with the 1050° temp from an actual RTG by building something like this (for the moment).

Comments?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
How about someone doing the most basic thing like identifying the best cheap metals for making thermocouples. Hopefully something found at the hardware store. I got a 55 gallon drum full of wood on fire here.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Back
Top