Nuclear Binding Energy Confusion

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of nuclear binding energy, its relationship to mass defect, and the implications for nuclear fusion and fission processes. Participants explore the definitions, calculations, and interpretations of binding energy in the context of nuclear reactions, seeking clarity on how these concepts interrelate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that nuclear binding energy is the energy required to separate a nucleus into its nucleons and question how this relates to mass defect.
  • Others explain that in nuclear reactions, comparing the total binding energy before and after can indicate whether a reaction is endothermic or exothermic based on energy deficits or surpluses.
  • A participant proposes that energy released during fusion is due to mass defect, suggesting that less mass correlates with released energy according to E=mc².
  • Some argue that fused nuclei have more binding energy than unfused ones for light elements, leading to energy release, while also noting that energy is needed to overcome repulsion between positively charged nuclei.
  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the relationship between binding energy and the energies of the original nuclei, questioning whether the total energy of the original nuclei is greater or less than that of the newly formed nucleus.
  • Another participant clarifies that a nucleus with more binding energy has less energy relative to unbound nucleons, and that fission can release energy if the new nucleus has a smaller rest energy than the sum of the original nuclei.
  • A later reply states that mass defect and binding energy are related through E=mc², and that nucleons interact via the strong nuclear force, drawing an analogy to chemical binding energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of binding energy and mass defect, with some agreeing on their relationship while others remain confused about the implications and calculations involved. No consensus is reached on the clarity of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of binding energy and mass defect, noting that the relationship may not be intuitive. There are unresolved questions regarding the nature of mass defect and its occurrence, as well as the implications for energy calculations in nuclear processes.

Greatness
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I read that nuclear binding energy is the energy required to separate a nucleus into its comprising nucleons.

Why then is mass defect calculated from this?
How is the nuclear binding energy graph used to calculate energy released from fusion?

Please explain in layman's terms, if you could explain some vocabulary involving your explanation, that would be great.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The nuclear binding energy tells the energy required to separate a nucleus into its comprising nucleons , as you said.
If in any reaction (not just nuclear fusion) you compare the total (add all the binding energy for different reactants/products) binding energy for before and after the reaction, you will see that there might be a difference between them. If you have an energy deficit, that energy must be provided for the reaction to occur and the reaction is considered endothermic. If you have a surplus, the extra energy is released by the reaction and the reaction is exothermic.
 
dauto said:
The nuclear binding energy tells the energy required to separate a nucleus into its comprising nucleons , as you said.
If in any reaction (not just nuclear fusion) you compare the total (add all the binding energy for different reactants/products) binding energy for before and after the reaction, you will see that there might be a difference between them. If you have an energy deficit, that energy must be provided for the reaction to occur and the reaction is considered endothermic. If you have a surplus, the extra energy is released by the reaction and the reaction is exothermic.

So, the energy released by fusion is due to the mass defect...
When there is less mass associated to the energy of the nucleus or atom, as per E=mc^2, then the extra energy is released...
Am I correct?
 
So then why is energy released when two nuclei fuse for light elements, it is not because extra energy is present when this occurs...
The fused nuclei have more binding energy than the unfused ones(for light elements). The excess is released by the reaction
In fusion, energy is required for the new nuclei to form but energy is still released as per the mass defect.
Energy is required to overcome the repulsion between positively charge nuclei, but more is produced at the end.

Note that none of that is different than what happens in chemical reactions. Paper doesn't burn expontaneously either. It requires some heat. But more heat is released by the reaction.

Binding energy, Mass defect - Potato, Potahto.
 
dauto said:
The fused nuclei have more binding energy than the unfused ones(for light elements). The excess is released by the reaction
Energy is required to overcome the repulsion between positively charge nuclei, but more is produced at the end.

Note that none of that is different than what happens in chemical reactions. Paper doesn't burn expontaneously either. It requires some heat. But more heat is released by the reaction.

Binding energy, Mass defect - Potato, Potahto.

Alright, but unfortunately I'm still confused with the use of "binding energy". When you say that the fused nuclei have more binding energy, does this mean that they require more energy to be separated into their nucleons? It seems very counterintuitive to me.
Are the energies of the first element + the energies of the second =, greater, or less than the energy of the newly formed nuclei resulting from fission? Is this energy binding energy or...I'm quite confused.
How are binding energy and mass defect related then?
 
Alright, but unfortunately I'm still confused with the use of "binding energy". When you say that the fused nuclei have more binding energy, does this mean that they require more energy to be separated into their nucleons? It seems very counterintuitive to me.
It is a bit counterintuitive, indeed - the more binding energy a nucleus has, the less energy it has (relative to a collection of unbound protons and neutrons).

Are the energies of the first element + the energies of the second =, greater, or less than the energy of the newly formed nuclei resulting from fission?
If fission releases energy, the new nucleus has a smaller rest energy than the sum of the original nuclei. The new nucleus has a larger binding energy, therefore the fission reaction can release energy.
 
mfb said:
It is a bit counterintuitive, indeed - the more binding energy a nucleus has, the less energy it has (relative to a collection of unbound protons and neutrons).

If fission releases energy, the new nucleus has a smaller rest energy than the sum of the original nuclei. The new nucleus has a larger binding energy, therefore the fission reaction can release energy.

Alright, thanks, I forgot about that.

Why does the new nucleus have a smaller rest energy, is it due to the mass defect? Why does the mass defect occur, do we even know?
 
The mass defect and the binding energy are the same thing. Related by Einsteins formula E=mc^2. It happens because nucleons interact with each other through the strong nuclear interaction. None of that should be very mysterious since it is completely analogous to what happens for instance in chemistry. When a Carbon atom binds to two oxygen atoms the binding energy gets released due to the electric interaction between the atoms. That binding energy is related to the mass defect through the Formula E=mc^2. The mass defect due to chemical interactions is much smaller than the ones due to Nuclear interactions but it exists nonetheless. Lavoisier principle is only approximately true.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K