Engineering Nuclear engineering with aerospace background

AI Thread Summary
A student in physics engineering is considering a concentration in aerospace engineering as a pathway to a future career in nuclear engineering, despite the absence of a dedicated atomic and nuclear physics program. The student believes that knowledge of thermal reactors and reactions gained from aerospace engineering could be beneficial. There is confidence expressed that nuclear power will remain relevant due to the lack of viable energy alternatives, despite public concerns stemming from events like Fukushima. The discussion highlights the importance of materials science in nuclear engineering, particularly regarding radiation effects, corrosion, and the challenges posed by advanced reactors. A background in aerospace and materials science is viewed as valuable for future employment in the nuclear sector, with potential roles in power plants or government agencies. The conversation also touches on emerging areas of interest, such as accident-tolerant nuclear fuel and the effects of long-term storage on nuclear materials.
bass_cannon
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a student in physics engineering and I would like to work as a nuclear engineering later on in my career but we don't have a proper atomic and nuclear physics concentration in my program. We have optics, aerospace engineering and materials science that come as close candidates as a replacement, so I was wondering if you guys think I'm making a good decision by going in aerospace engineering concentration. I was thinking that maybe the knowledge that I will get concerning thermal reactors and thermal reactions could prove useful for nuclear engineering.

Ideally I will go for a master's degree in nuclear engineering at a university that offers it. But for the moment I wonder if an employer in nuclear engineering would appreciate hiring an engineer with both aerospace/mechanical engineering and atomic and nuclear physics background.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am also wondering if nuclear engineering will still be in vogue considering what has happened with Fukushima. Do you think the interest in nuclear power will rise again in a few years or should I really consider another career?
 
bass_cannon said:
I am also wondering if nuclear engineering will still be in vogue considering what has happened with Fukushima. Do you think the interest in nuclear power will rise again in a few years or should I really consider another career?

Nuclear power is here to stay. We don't even have a viable alternative to creating the energy we need. The problem is public perception and the fact that people fear what they don't really understand. I think we need to build better reactors, something a long the lines of the liquid fluoride thorium reactors. Look these up. Then we also have the ultimate power which is a type of nuclear reaction.Fusion. My point, you will find a job somewhere, whether that be a power plant, or government agency or whatever. I'm a nuclear engineering student
 
bass_cannon said:
Hello,

I am a student in physics engineering and I would like to work as a nuclear engineering later on in my career but we don't have a proper atomic and nuclear physics concentration in my program. We have optics, aerospace engineering and materials science that come as close candidates as a replacement, so I was wondering if you guys think I'm making a good decision by going in aerospace engineering concentration. I was thinking that maybe the knowledge that I will get concerning thermal reactors and thermal reactions could prove useful for nuclear engineering.

Ideally I will go for a master's degree in nuclear engineering at a university that offers it. But for the moment I wonder if an employer in nuclear engineering would appreciate hiring an engineer with both aerospace/mechanical engineering and atomic and nuclear physics background.

Thanks
In the absence of atomic and nuclear physics or undergraduate nuclear engineering, a background in aerospace engineering and materials science would be valuable.

While I majored in nuclear engineering (after having majored in nuclear/astrophysics), I took a number of courses in aerospace engineering, electrical engineering and materials science.

Some of the big challenges involve materials, particularly radiation effects and corrosion. Advanced reactors often involve higher temperatures which means a more aggressive environment for materials. For materials, a hot, relatively new area is 'phase field theory' and 'atomic/molecular dynamics'. For older reactors, Gen II and Gen III, materials aging and degradation is a key area of interest. For nuclear fuel, the effects of long term dry storage and eventual disposition are areas of interest, as is the matter of 'accident tolerant' nuclear fuel.
 
Hello, I graduated from undergrad a few years ago with a Major in Physics and minor in Electrical Engineering. I tried to get experience working on and testing circuits through my professor who studied Neutrinos, however covid caused the opportunity to go away and I graduated with no experience or internships. I have attempted to break into the engineering industry with no success. Right now I am considering going for a Masters in Electrical Engineering and I need advice on if this would be...
I don't know if anyone on here works for any of the well known defense companies of your country, whichever country you are from?? Also, if you choose to work in one, do you think the engineering education provide from your school would adequately prepare you for the job. What do I mean by that? Well if you work at say Lockheed Martin and you work in the latest iteration of a missile or if you work at Pratt & Whitney, they assign you to work in the team helping out with building the jet...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
17K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top