[nuclear physics]Understanding what's type of interaction is

  • Thread starter Thread starter valleyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction Type
valleyman
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


My problem is on questions like "say if the following interactions are allowed or prohibited, and explain why." where the interactions are something like

p + p -> K^+ + K^-

or

e^- + p -> n + \nu_e


The Attempt at a Solution


Now the first one is not allowed because charge and barionic number are not conserved, ok, but the second is allowed and the solution says it is weak interaction. How do I recognize what type of interaction takes place? Are there any rules like those one of the conservation?
Note: my problem isn't specifically on those particular interactions I just need to understand how to recognize, in a general way, what type of interaction is
Thanks for the help,
valleyman
 
Physics news on Phys.org
valleyman said:

Homework Statement


My problem is on questions like "say if the following interactions are allowed or prohibited, and explain why." where the interactions are something like

p + p -> K^+ + K^-

or

e^- + p -> n + \nu_e

The Attempt at a Solution


Now the first one is not allowed because charge and barionic number are not conserved, ok, but the second is allowed and the solution says it is weak interaction. How do I recognize what type of interaction takes place? Are there any rules like those one of the conservation?
Note: my problem isn't specifically on those particular interactions I just need to understand how to recognize, in a general way, what type of interaction is
Thanks for the help,
valleyman
Tip: Use \rightarrow to get an arrow in LaTeX.

Here's a few rules of thumb to help identify which interaction is responsible: If there's a photon, then you know it has to be an electromagnetic interaction. Similarly, if there's a neutrino, it has to be a weak interaction. If quark flavor isn't conserved, like in kaon decay, it's a weak interaction.
 
Thanks for the help those rules are very useful but there are still some things I don't understand! what if my reaction doesn't show either photons or neutrinos? And how do I check if quark flavour is conserved?
For example
e+e^-\rightarrow p+\overline{p}
this is e.m., right? But what if it is
e+e^-\rightarrow k^++k^-
Shouldn't it be e.m. anyways? How do I decide??
Thanks
valleyman
 
You have to know what vertices are allowed for the various leptons and quarks, and generally you have to know the quark content of the various mesons and baryons. Electrons do not have color charge, so they will not interact through the strong force. So both reactions have to be either electromagnetic, where the electron and positron annihilate and create a virtual photon, or weak, where they annihilate and emit a virtual Z. At low energies, electromagnetism is going to dominate because the Z is so massive.

With only leptons in the initial state, the quark numbers will all be 0. Since the final state consists of a particle and its antiparticle, the quark numbers for each flavor will also be 0, so there's no problem with quark flavors.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top