Nuclear weapons active research program/new designs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear Research
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the current state of nuclear weapons engineering, particularly regarding plutonium (Pu) systems and their advantages for warhead designs. It highlights the challenges of using modern hydrogen bombs due to their immense power, suggesting a need for smaller, tactical nuclear options that could be more usable in specific scenarios. However, developing such weapons would violate international treaties and non-proliferation agreements. While research into nuclear weapons continues in controlled environments, formal education on bomb engineering is limited and often restricted. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities and legal constraints surrounding nuclear weapons development today.
ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
reading my earlier thread about India and thorium
Astronuc said:
Pu systems are smaller and yields higher (better for muliple (cluster) warhead systems), and they make for better triggers for thermonuclear weapons.

makes me wonder whether nuclear weapons remains an active engineering field with any new proposed designs of nuclear weapons?

hard to imagine given the cold war is over and current h-bombs are powerful enough
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ensabah6 said:
hard to imagine given the cold war is over and current h-bombs are powerful enough
Current H bombs are too powerful, that's why you can't use them.
A bomb that was only the equivalent of a few tons to a few 10s of tons of TNT might be very useful against caves or concrete bunkers and by not killing the surrounding 100,000 people you might be more tempted to use one.

Of course developing one would be against all sorts of treaties and non-proliferation conventions so obviously no-one would dream of doing it.
 
mgb_phys said:
Current H bombs are too powerful, that's why you can't use them.
A bomb that was only the equivalent of a few tons to a few 10s of tons of TNT might be very useful against caves or concrete bunkers and by not killing the surrounding 100,000 people you might be more tempted to use one.

Of course developing one would be against all sorts of treaties and non-proliferation conventions so obviously no-one would dream of doing it.

so there's actual research into this? do nuclear engineering programs teach students about how to engineer nuclear bombs?
 
ensabah6 said:
so there's actual research into this?
Research yes - development would be illegal.

do nuclear engineering programs teach students about how to engineer nuclear bombs?
In N. Korea possibly. In most countries nuclear weapon design tends to be a bit more secret.
 
ensabah6 said:
so there's actual research into this? do nuclear engineering programs teach students about how to engineer nuclear bombs?
To my knowledge, no. Most programs provide sufficient background to enable one to calculate critical masses of fissile materials. Much of what was in the public domain has been removed since the 1980's.

The program in which I obtained my degrees had a course in nuclear weapons, but it was restricted. Ultimately it was discontinued.


Nuclear weapons research is conducted under controlled and restricted conditions at certain national labs. People involved do not talk about their work outside of the lab.
 
Last edited:
mgb_phys said:
Current H bombs are too powerful, that's why you can't use them...
Most of the modern weapons are hybrids. As Astronuc indicated, Pu is used to ingite secondary thermonuclear (i.e. fusion) explosions, using H based fuel.
 
Last edited:
Astronuc said:
To my knowledge, no. Most programs provide sufficient background to enable one to calculate critical masses of fissile materials. Much of what was in the public domain has been removed since the 1980's.

The program in which I obtained my degrees had a course in nuclear weapons, but it was restricted. Ultimately it was discontinued.

you answered my questions, thanks
 
Back
Top