Numerially integrate the radial schrodinger equation

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
i now need to integrate the time-dependent schrodinger equation in 2D

the potential is rotationally invariant and so is the initial wave function

thus the symmetry of the initial wave function will be preserved in time

Instead of a 2D equation, i now only need to integrate a 1d equation about the radial part of the wave function.

However, in doing so i encounter some difficulties. There are terms like 1/r \partial_r in the equation.

near the origin, this term will diverge!

I guess this is a well-solved problem. Could anyone give me some help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(Why'd this get moved here, of all places? It's a math problem. Numerical methods, really.)

I guess this is a well-solved problem. Could anyone give me some help?

Well, more of an ill-conditioned problem, really. :)
I'm not at all a numerics expert, but the simplest (but surely not most efficient) numerical method that comes to mind would be to calculate the integral from h to infinity and shrink h until you're within convergence limits. You could also use Richardson extrapolation to improve on that.
 
wdlang,

The 1/r potential term is best handled by recognizing that the value from the analytical solution at r = 0 for the hydrogen atom is 1. You should try to define a cut-off radius, which inside this radius the wavefuntion takes on the above value. Also, be careful of your radius step-size: use a small enough step size so your solution doesn't blow up.
 
Modey3 said:
wdlang,

The 1/r potential term is best handled by recognizing that the value from the analytical solution at r = 0 for the hydrogen atom is 1. You should try to define a cut-off radius, which inside this radius the wavefuntion takes on the above value. Also, be careful of your radius step-size: use a small enough step size so your solution doesn't blow up.

Thanks a lot!

but I do not mean the 1/r potential

i mean the lapalace operator in polar coordinates, 2D

you will find a term 1/r(d/dr)

This term diverge near the origin.

I do not know how to handle it. Moreover, i am interested in the time-dependent S equation, not the time-independent S equation.
 
I recommend you take the unknown wavefunction psi(r) and replace it with u(r)/r. Substitute psi = u / r into your equation and you will hopefully find a less ill-conditioned problem for u.
 
confinement said:
I recommend you take the unknown wavefunction psi(r) and replace it with u(r)/r. Substitute psi = u / r into your equation and you will hopefully find a less ill-conditioned problem for u.

Yes, but that works for 3D

I am concerned with the 2D case.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top