Nyquist Sampling Thm - Question 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter cepheid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sampling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Nyquist sampling theorem and the computation of the Nyquist sampling frequency for the derivative of a signal, dx/dt, in relation to the original signal x(t). The original signal has a Nyquist frequency defined as ω_s, which corresponds to its maximum frequency ω_M. The reasoning presented concludes that the spectrum of the differentiated signal remains band-limited to the same maximum frequency ω_M, implying that its Nyquist sampling frequency is also 2ω_M, identical to that of the original signal. Therefore, the Nyquist sampling frequency for the derivative signal is confirmed to be the same as that of the original signal, ω_s. This reasoning is affirmed as valid within the context of the discussion.
cepheid
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,197
Reaction score
38
Hello,

This is the same type of question as the one I just posted before. This time I have obtained an answer and would really appreciate it if someone would check my reasoning:

Suppose a signal x(t) has a Nyquist sampling frequency \omega_s. Compute the Nyquist sampling frequency for the following signal in terms of \omega_s:

dx/dt

Again, my first thought was, how does the spectrum of the new signal compare to that of the original? Simple:

\mathcal{F}\{\frac{dx}{dt}\} = j\omega X(j\omega)

So, I obtained an answer through reasoning rather than computation. Here was my reasoning: if the spectrum of the original signal x(t) has some maximum frequency \omega_M i.e. it is band limited such that:

|X(jw)| = 0 for |w| > w_M

then we know that:

\omega_s = 2\omega_M

Furthermore, |jwX(jw)| is zero whenever |X(jw)| is zero, therefore, the spectrum jwX(jw) of the differentiated signal is STILL zero outside of this frequency range i.e. it is band-limited in exactly the same way. Therefore, it's maximum frequency is also \omega_M, which means that its Nyquist sampling frequency is also given by 2\omega_M. In other words, the Nyquist sampling frequency of the new signal is just the SAME as that of the old signal: \omega_s.

Does this reasoning hold?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, it holds alright.
 
Back
Top