Object and a 3d direction vector

badescuga
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
i have an object and a 3d direction vector and position for it . I would like to know how do i determine if a certain point X is in the space below the plan determined by my direction ?

Here is an image that i have drawn to make it more clear . In this image I've made the vector 2d

http://yfrog.com/53imgukp

Please Help!Regards,
Aleandru Badescu
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you mean a "plane" or a "line"?

A single vector determines a line, Ax+ By= C, in two dimensions. A point (x,y) is on that line if y= (C- Ax)/B. It is "below" that line if y< (C- Ax)/B. If B is positive (and you can always arrange for B to be positive by multiplying the entire equation by -1 if necesary) that is the same as Ax+ By< C.

In three dimensions, a single vector <A, B, C>, determines a plane Ax+ By+ Cz< D. (x, y, z) is "below" that line if z< (D- Ax- By)/C. Again, if C is positive, that is the same as Ax+ By+ Cz< D.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top