Object detection through magnetic signature [field]?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of distinguishing between similar objects, specifically casseroles, using their magnetic signatures without visual analysis. Participants highlight that the objects must possess magnetic properties for detection, with MRI scanners being a potential method if they are magnetized. The conversation also explores the idea of using variations in the Earth's magnetic field to identify interference caused by metal objects, suggesting that differences in material properties could allow for differentiation. The practicality of this method hinges on the distinctiveness of the magnetic signals produced by each object. Overall, while theoretically possible, the effectiveness of detecting and distinguishing similar objects magnetically remains uncertain and dependent on specific conditions.
pettt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to figure out if a group of similar objects "A's" can be distinguished from different group of similar objects "B's" without using any means of visual analysis, be it a laser scanning or measurement of dimensions. I want to know if one could analyze or map the magnetic signature of an "A" (for instance a certain brand of casserole) – if such a thing exists – and detect another "A" casserole through comparing the magnetic signature.

Am I getting my question through?

Thanks,
Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I know what you mean by magnetic structure, are the objects of interest magnetised? This can be detected in an MRI scanner.
 
the object you are trying to detect has to have some magnetic properties without them and MRI would be useless.
Magnetic detectors can't detect paper for example and tell if it's different from another paper by color.
 
Thanks for your answers,
I am thinking about by IndoorAtlas (http://www.indooratlas.com) – they utilise the variations in the Earth's magnetic field to navigate.

The objects all consists of a high percentage of metal. In reply to MikeyW they would have to be magnetised unless one uses a MRI scanner.

The Earth's magnetic field is ubiquitous. If I place a metal object in a spot where I know what the Earth's magnetic field looks like, I'm thinking I should be able to detect the interference made by that object, seeing as metals are affected by magnetic fields.

So theoretically, should I be able to distinguish mass produced casseroles from different brands if I place them in the exact same spot? Or is there no truth to almost identical objects having a "magnetic signature?"
 
If the different objects have different permeabilities, permittivities, and/or conductivities, then it is possible to distinguish them using an excitation coil and a detector, yes. Whether it's practical to do so depends on how different the signal will be for each distinct object. It's also possible (and practical to varying degrees) to image the inside an object, if you have enough coils/detectors.

Is there any more information you can give about what the target is?
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top