Object detector using ultrasonic sensor with 555 timer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the challenges of using a 555 timer in conjunction with an ultrasonic distance sensor for object detection. Key issues include the inadequacy of a 3.3 pF capacitor, which is deemed too small for the 555 oscillator, and the need for a timing capacitor of at least 470 pF. The optimal timing capacitor value calculated is approximately 24 nF, with 22 nF being the closest available option. Additionally, the ultrasonic sensor requires more than just a timer for effective operation, and a comparator may be necessary for maximum range detection.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 555 timer IC operation
  • Familiarity with capacitor values and their impact on oscillator frequency
  • Knowledge of ultrasonic distance sensor functionality
  • Basic electronics concepts, including resistors and potentiometers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and applications of the 555 timer IC
  • Learn about capacitor selection for timing circuits
  • Explore the operation and integration of ultrasonic distance sensors
  • Investigate the use of comparators in sensor applications
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, hobbyists building object detection systems, and engineers working with timing circuits and ultrasonic sensors will benefit from this discussion.

engnrshyckh
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
I am doing a simple project in which i want to detect object using 555 timer and ultrasonic sensor.
See the attached figure.
I used 220uF with buzzer and also tried 10uF capacitor but buzzer isn't loud enough. I don't have any 3.3pf capacitor. I used 1.1 pF instead. I also tried changing the resistance of potentiometer but still buzzer isn't sound loud enough.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20221017_205300_com.android.chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20221017_205300_com.android.chrome.jpg
    19.8 KB · Views: 207
Engineering news on Phys.org
The 3.3 pF capacitor is much too small for a 555 oscillator.
frequency = 1.46 / ( (R1 + 2*R2) * C )
C = 1.46 / ( 5kHz * ( 10k + 2*1k) ) = 24 nF
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fisherman199 and BvU
Baluncore said:
The 3.3 pF capacitor is much too small for a 555 oscillator.
frequency = 1.46 / ( (R1 + 2*R2) * C )
C = 1.46 / ( 5kHz * ( 10k + 2*1k) ) = 24 nF
I don't have such values of capacitance can i change the value of R2 FOR fixed value of C i. I 3.3pF
 
engnrshyckh said:
I don't have such values of capacitance can i change the value of R2 FOR fixed value of C i. I 3.3pF
I have no idea what you are suggesting there.

If I remember correctly, the 555 needs a timing capacitor of 470pF minimum.
The 3.3pF is not useful anywhere in the circuit. I do not know why the website showed that value on the schematic. If you look in the parts list, you will see it specifies a 3.3nF capacitor. That is a better choice.

I computed a timing capacitor value of about 24nF. The closest available value will probably be 22nF. Try any value of capacitance you can find between (1nF = 0.001uF) and (100nF = 0.1uF).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/555_timer_IC#Astable
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fisherman199, DaveE and hutchphd
Windadct said:
- the sensor in your image looks like a Ultrasonic DISTANCE sensor -
If there is no reflector within range in the 15° beam, then it does not produce a detection pulse, so it may be used as a detector without range.
 
Windadct said:
Asside from the 555 issues - the sensor in your image looks like a Ultrasonic DISTANCE sensor -

https://www.sparkfun.com/products/15569

This needs more then a timer.
Yes it is so may be a commarotor will work
 
Yes, a comparator will likely work.

Although likely needed only for the maximum range of 4 meters, please note the comment on page 3 of the datasheet:
(bold added)
When tested objects, the range of area is not less than 0.5 square meters and the plane requests as smooth as possible, otherwise, it will affect the
results of measuring.

Cheers,
Tom
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
23K
  • · Replies 107 ·
4
Replies
107
Views
30K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K