How Do Object Space and Image Space Affect Lens Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Space
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effective focal length and magnification for a lens with given parameters. The object distance is 200 mm, the object space index is 1.5, and the front focal length is -80 mm. The calculations reveal a magnification of -2/3, indicating the image is inverted. The effective focal length is determined to be approximately 53.33 mm. Understanding the optical spaces and the correct index of refraction is crucial for these calculations.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,179
Reaction score
7,656

Homework Statement


For an object distance z = 200 mm, an object space index n = 1.5, and a front focal length ff = −80 mm, what is the effective focal length f and the magnification m? Is the image upright or inverted?

Homework Equations


Lots and lots of gaussian and Newtonian imaging equations!
But I'm guessing one of the equations is: ##\frac{z}{f_f} = 1-\frac{1}{m}##

The Attempt at a Solution



My confusion here has to do with the optical spaces. Since z is positive, the object is to the right of the lens. But is the object space to the right of the lens as well? I've read in my book that optical spaces actually extend from negative infinity to positive infinity, but I don't quite understand it yet. Also, which index of refraction, n or n', is 1.5?

Nevermind, I'm stupid. They tell me it's ##n## right in the question.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the equation above, I get:

##\frac{z}{f_f} = 1-\frac{1}{m} ##

##\frac{200}{-80} = 1-\frac{1}{m}##

## \frac{5}{2} = \frac{m-1}{m}##

##5m=2m-2##

##3m=-2##

##m=-\frac{2}{3}##
 
I'm stupid, they tell me ##n## right in the question. Using the following equation:

##\frac{z}{n}=\frac{1-m}{m}f_e##

Plugging in 1.5 for ##n##, 200 for ##z##, and ##-\frac{2}{3}## for m gives me 53.33 mm.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top