Occupation Numbers Of Phonons/Photons

  • Thread starter Thread starter pirate phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
pirate phy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
According to Mahan, phonons or photons doesn't have occupation number. Is this true?http://i.tinyuploads.com/MBwW0j.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there are states with definite photons number (Fock states)
and there are states (e.g coherent states) which are not eigenvectors of the " occupation number" hermitian operator.
 
pirate phy said:
According to Mahan, phonons or photons doesn't have occupation number. Is this true?http://i.tinyuploads.com/MBwW0j.jpg

The text is not saying that. It says that the particular states mentioned (excitations) are
superpositions of states with a different but definite number of photons.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top