Mathematica Occurence of fundamental mathematical constants

AI Thread Summary
Fundamental mathematical constants such as 0, 1, phi, e, pi, and delta predominantly occur within the interval 0 to 5, raising questions about this confluence among an infinite set of numbers. The discussion suggests that this phenomenon may be linked to the ease of discovering smaller constants, as our perception of 'small' is influenced by the numerical scale we use. Additionally, the use of natural units allows for the simplification of physical constants, although these constants are not confined to the same range. The exploration of infinite sums involving small integers often leads to the derivation of significant constants, indicating a potential reason for their prevalence. Overall, the relationship between the size of constants and their mathematical significance remains a topic of interest.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
0, 1, phi (the Golden ratio), e, pi, delta (Feigenbaum's constant) and comparatively many other fundamental, dimensionless mathematical constants occur on the interval 0 to 5. With a potential infinity of numbers to choose from, why does such a confluence exist?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the physical constant.. perhaps they lie on [0,5] due to the strength of the interactions (weak, strong) in many cases using 'Natural units' you can set them equal to value '1'
 
Sangoku said:
For the physical constant.. perhaps they lie on [0,5] due to the strength of the interactions (weak, strong) in many cases using 'Natural units' you can set them equal to value '1'

But physical constants are in no way limited to [0,5] like mathematical constants appear to be. Just consider Planck's constant and Avogadro's number in SI units.
 
Loren Booda said:
0, 1, phi (the Golden ratio), e, pi, delta (Feigenbaum's constant) and comparatively many other fundamental, dimensionless mathematical constants occur on the interval 0 to 5. With a potential infinity of numbers to choose from, why does such a confluence exist?

Maybe small ones are easy to discover. Maybe our idea of 'small' is tied to the size of these constants (no, really -- 1 is the measure by which we count, so if it were 'larger' so would be our concept of 'small').

Maybe it's just easier to find and work with small constants -- perhaps the order of the Monster group is just as fundamental, but less has been done with it since it's so large.
 
Maybe it's because the infinite sums that start off involving small numbers like 1, 2, 3, .. or 1!, 2!, 3!, etc. yield the most interesting and general constants:

e=1+1+1/2+1/6+1/24+1/120+... approx = 2 + 1/2 = 2.5
pi= 4 - 4/3 + 4/5 - 4/7 +... approx = 4 - 4/3 = 2.66666...
phi = (1 + 1/phi) = (1 + 1/(1+1/phi)) = ... approx = 1 + 1 / (1 + 1) = 1.5
euler mascheroni gamma = (1 - ln 2/1) + (1/2 - ln 3/2) + (1/3 - ln 4/3) + ...
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
163
Views
26K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
981
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Back
Top