Odd/Even functions and integration of them

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concepts of odd and even functions in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the parity of wave functions. The user understands that cosine functions are even, yet struggles with the implications of squaring the wave function when calculating the expectation value of position. It is clarified that while the squared wave function remains even, the inclusion of the variable x, which is odd, leads to the product being odd. This results in the integral of the expectation value being zero due to the properties of odd functions over symmetric intervals. The user acknowledges their oversight regarding the role of x in the calculations.
FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2
I was not sure where to post this here or in calculus, but seeing as the underlying basic principle of my question is regarding parity of functions I am posting it here, but feel free to move if needed.

Basically I am getting ready for a (intro to) QM exam and I still struggle with some basic concepts such as the parity of functions. I mean, I get the basic premise that if ##f(-x)=f(x)## then the function is even and if ##f(-x)=-f(x)## then it is odd, yet I still seem to struggle and things that are in my lecurers notes confuse me.

Essentially we are given a (wave) function which is essentially a cosine function ## \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} cos(\frac{3 \pi x}{a}) ## to be precise, and looking at a past paper that has outline solutions, one question asks the parity of the function, I answered even since its a cos function and that is what the answer was. But then, it asks us to find the expectation value of position which requires squaring the given function and integrating over all space, but the question only has 2 marks so only quick sentence is needed, and the answer given in the solutions that it is zero because the integral is of an ODD function.

That is the bit that confuses me, how has it become an odd function, just simply by squaring it? It is still symmetric about the y-axis is it not? And if you put -x into either of the now two cosine functions, surely they both spit out the same number if x was inserted?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When you calculate the expectation value of position in one dimension, the integrand will be something like ##x|\psi(x)|^2##. ##x## is an odd function, if furthermore ##|\psi(x)|^2## is even, then the product of them will be?
 
  • Like
Likes FaraDazed
blue_leaf77 said:
When you calculate the expectation value of position in one dimension, the integrand will be something like ##x|\psi(x)|^2##. ##x## is an odd function, if furthermore ##|\psi(x)|^2## is even, then the product of them will be?

Ah yeah. Sorry. I forgot about that pesky x, and was focusing only on the wavefunction and wavefunction squared thinking that I was missing something there!

Plus as a mature student, the time I learn about parity of numbers in general and multiplying them etc was about 16 years ago (probs longer)! Forgot that there were general rules about that! Gosh I feel stupid now haha.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top