ODE with Parameter: Is \phi(x,0) a Solution to y' = f(x,y,0)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dipole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ode Parameter
dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151

Homework Statement



In a HW assignment, I'm given the ODE

y' = f(x,y,\epsilon)

and that y = \phi(x,\epsilon)is a solution to this equation.

I'm then asked, is \phi(x,0) a solution to the equation

y' = f(x,y,0)

This result is used for the second part of the problem, and in the question I'm told I can just quote a well known theorem to explain why it's true, but I have no idea what theorem that might be. Any ideas, or maybe how to even prove it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is a theorem on the dependence of ODE solutions on parameters. I am sure it has been covered in your course of ODEs.
 
You would think so, but the professor constantly assigns HW that has little relevance to what we've actually done in lecture. Also we have no textbook to use as a reference.
 
Since the derivative is with respect to x, not \epsilon, we can write \phi(x, \epsilon)'= f(x, y, \epsilon) and set \epsilon= 0 in that equation:
\phi(x, 0)'= f(x, y, 0).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top